Obama signs bill to make protesting illegal
-
Kathryn O:
21st Century Paul, I'm finding what you're saying very interesting in how this 'divide and conquer but don't let them know we're one big party' is happening everywhere. I guess it really is the 99% against the 1%
More like the 99.999% against the 0.001 %....
-
walliebaby:
21st Century Paul:
No comment, it speaks for itself. So Americans can't critice their politicians here anymore?
If you read more about the bill from other news sources, the bill is an anti-trespass bill, not a bill that eliminates criticism of elected officials. I'm not in favor of this bill, mind you, but I don't want people misrepresenting the bill, either.
I don't know what the bill is exactly about really, that's why I'm asking... But I've got the feeling that....
the way things are going... in the end the final result will be zero freedom of speech. And also others rights and freedom of the people eliminated. -
rich n:
walliebaby:
21st Century Paul:
No comment, it speaks for itself. So Americans can't critice their politicians here anymore?
If you read more about the bill from other news sources, the bill is an anti-trespass bill, not a bill that eliminates criticism of elected officials. I'm not in favor of this bill, mind you, but I don't want people misrepresenting the bill, either.
This is true - more or less. It concerns 'disruptions', effecting controlls by secret service, especially concerning campaign stops and events ...But this is actually open to interpretation and in my opinion, opens the door to further impeding free speech...which is why i think it's disgusting and I don't support one word of it Net result is that while it unto itself isn't directly a blow to freedom of speech, it is planting the seeds to such a direction
It's look like that, who on America is gonna want that? Not the Dems voters of the Reps voters, I see... Only the Dems and Reps themselves. That's why that's so serious.
-
rich n:
walliebaby:
21st Century Paul:
No comment, it speaks for itself. So Americans can't critice their politicians here anymore?
If you read more about the bill from other news sources, the bill is an anti-trespass bill, not a bill that eliminates criticism of elected officials. I'm not in favor of this bill, mind you, but I don't want people misrepresenting the bill, either.
This is true - more or less. It concerns 'disruptions', effecting controlls by secret service, especially concerning campaign stops and events ...But this is actually open to interpretation and in my opinion, opens the door to further impeding free speech...which is why i think it's disgusting and I don't support one word of it Net result is that while it unto itself isn't directly a blow to freedom of speech, it is planting the seeds to such a direction
The reason I'm not in favor of it is the grey area you mentioned. Anything that infringes upon free speech makes me nervous. It's not as bad as the ironically-named Patriot Act, though.
: However, I'm not happy with this bill, at all... -
walliebaby:
rich n:
walliebaby:
21st Century Paul:
No comment, it speaks for itself. So Americans can't critice their politicians here anymore?
If you read more about the bill from other news sources, the bill is an anti-trespass bill, not a bill that eliminates criticism of elected officials. I'm not in favor of this bill, mind you, but I don't want people misrepresenting the bill, either.
This is true - more or less. It concerns 'disruptions', effecting controlls by secret service, especially concerning campaign stops and events ...But this is actually open to interpretation and in my opinion, opens the door to further impeding free speech...which is why i think it's disgusting and I don't support one word of it Net result is that while it unto itself isn't directly a blow to freedom of speech, it is planting the seeds to such a direction
The reason I'm not in favor of it is the grey area you mentioned. Anything that infringes upon free speech makes me nervous. It's not as bad as the ironically-named Patriot Act, though.
: However, I'm not happy with this bill, at all...Btw - one thing to note is that this Bill is a full fledged bipartisan failure with almost unanimous support from both sides of the isle as well as the President's signature
-
rich n:
walliebaby:
rich n:
walliebaby:
21st Century Paul:
No comment, it speaks for itself. So Americans can't critice their politicians here anymore?
If you read more about the bill from other news sources, the bill is an anti-trespass bill, not a bill that eliminates criticism of elected officials. I'm not in favor of this bill, mind you, but I don't want people misrepresenting the bill, either.
This is true - more or less. It concerns 'disruptions', effecting controlls by secret service, especially concerning campaign stops and events ...But this is actually open to interpretation and in my opinion, opens the door to further impeding free speech...which is why i think it's disgusting and I don't support one word of it Net result is that while it unto itself isn't directly a blow to freedom of speech, it is planting the seeds to such a direction
The reason I'm not in favor of it is the grey area you mentioned. Anything that infringes upon free speech makes me nervous. It's not as bad as the ironically-named Patriot Act, though.
: However, I'm not happy with this bill, at all...Btw - one thing to note is that this Bill is a full fledged bipartisan failure with almost unanimous support from both sides of the isle as well as the President's signature
Now that is interesting...and here I was hoping for more bipartisan efforts from the government to bring the country back together.
Yup, that was a bad idea on my part. -
yeah I been working on forming a small neighborhood HOA. Its amazing the government gets anything done.. I'm seeing first hand how impossible it is to get even a small group who bought property with already rules laid out as guidelines to agree on the meaning of is. It amazing how people can twist things and some just refuse to do what they agree to do. I think corporation have become so powerful they have the best lawyers and it all about who got the smartest lawyers. That why the president has no power to make the changes the people want them to make. I suspect a large amount of taxes go to attorney fighting even the smallest changes. and thats a broken system.
