Sunny Heights
-
-
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy Shit. They're shitting. It's amazing all the same and hopeless at the same time.
Such an atypical house, razed for something that makes you puke. I sincerely hate people who show they're rich and attack heritage because they think they have every right. ️ -
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy Shit. They're shitting. It's amazing all the same and hopeless at the same time.
Such an atypical house, razed for something that makes you puke. I sincerely hate people who show they're rich and attack heritage because they think they have every right. ️I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
-
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
@wandy That is true.
-
-
@njr said in Ringo’s old home in Weybridge to be demolished!:
@NJR
@wandy has already posted this article.https://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/topic/8892/sunny-heights
-
-
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@njr said in Ringo’s old home in Weybridge to be demolished!:
@NJR
@wandy has already posted this article.https://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/topic/8892/sunny-heights
Didn’t realize. My post was moved here by the Mod.
-
-
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
@wandy That is true.
The same thing happened to Ringo's Tittenhurst Park Estate. He sold it to an Arab guy called, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, he had no idea about Britain's Listed Buildings laws. These buildings are protected by law/government, and musnt be altered without permission from the authorities. The sultan changed a heck of a lot of stuff there. He got onto trouble with the local council, but it was too late, the damage had already been done. I have often wondered what would have happened if the Beatles had been allowed to keep their mural on the front of the Apple Boutique in Baker Street. I believe now it too would be protected by the government. Oh well
-
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
The same thing happened to Ringo's Tittenhurst Park Estate. He sold it to an Arab guy called, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, he had no idea about Britain's Listed Buildings laws. These buildings are protected by law/government, and musnt be altered without permission from the authorities. The sultan changed a heck of a lot of stuff there. He got onto trouble with the local council, but it was too late, the damage had already been done. I have often wondered what would have happened if the Beatles had been allowed to keep their mural on the front of the Apple Boutique in Baker Street. I believe now it too would be protected by the government. Oh well
@wandy Well. That's a story. Very sad
I have one, but it's not about the Beatles. It's just almost the same thing but worse. It's in an African country. There's a natural area that's protected. So it's basically all right. Well, it's not. There's an ancient tribe that's nearby and it's disturbing, because the government has sold part of the reserve to the sultan, if I'm not mistaken. I don't know his name. Who is using this land for illegal hunting. But it's a nature reserve and the government tolerates it. Even hunting the local population so that this horrible part can happen. So many people end up migrating to other countries. This is a documentary I saw. Really interesting. -
@njr said in Sunny Heights:
Didn’t realize. My post was moved here by the Mod.
@NJR That's okay. It happens
-
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
@wandy That is true.
The same thing happened to Ringo's Tittenhurst Park Estate. He sold it to an Arab guy called, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, he had no idea about Britain's Listed Buildings laws. These buildings are protected by law/government, and musnt be altered without permission from the authorities. The sultan changed a heck of a lot of stuff there. He got onto trouble with the local council, but it was too late, the damage had already been done. I have often wondered what would have happened if the Beatles had been allowed to keep their mural on the front of the Apple Boutique in Baker Street. I believe now it too would be protected by the government. Oh well
You’re quite right (slick) Look at the mural that was painted on the Empress Pub by Ringo’s old Liverpool home. That wouldn’t have been tolerated in the ‘60s!
-
@njr said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
@wandy That is true.
The same thing happened to Ringo's Tittenhurst Park Estate. He sold it to an Arab guy called, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, he had no idea about Britain's Listed Buildings laws. These buildings are protected by law/government, and musnt be altered without permission from the authorities. The sultan changed a heck of a lot of stuff there. He got onto trouble with the local council, but it was too late, the damage had already been done. I have often wondered what would have happened if the Beatles had been allowed to keep their mural on the front of the Apple Boutique in Baker Street. I believe now it too would be protected by the government. Oh well
You’re quite right (slick) Look at the mural that was painted on the Empress Pub by Ringo’s old Liverpool home. That wouldn’t have been tolerated in the ‘60s!
Agreed! Problem was ( imho) back in the 1960s, the London councils would have consisted of ( mostly) men who had fought in the second world war, and these "old" men now in their 40s, which would definitely seem old to the Beatles, did not risk their lives fighting in a war so long Haired hippy jumped up unimportant pop stars could paint their stupid ugly hideous drug induced paintings on the side of perfectly good buildings. Just saying like.
-
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@njr said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
@wandy That is true.
The same thing happened to Ringo's Tittenhurst Park Estate. He sold it to an Arab guy called, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, he had no idea about Britain's Listed Buildings laws. These buildings are protected by law/government, and musnt be altered without permission from the authorities. The sultan changed a heck of a lot of stuff there. He got onto trouble with the local council, but it was too late, the damage had already been done. I have often wondered what would have happened if the Beatles had been allowed to keep their mural on the front of the Apple Boutique in Baker Street. I believe now it too would be protected by the government. Oh well
You’re quite right (slick) Look at the mural that was painted on the Empress Pub by Ringo’s old Liverpool home. That wouldn’t have been tolerated in the ‘60s!
Agreed! Problem was ( imho) back in the 1960s, the London councils would have consisted of ( mostly) men who had fought in the second world war, and these "old" men now in their 40s, which would definitely seem old to the Beatles, did not risk their lives fighting in a war so long Haired hippy jumped up unimportant pop stars could paint their stupid ugly hideous drug induced paintings on the side of perfectly good buildings. Just saying like.
“I fought in the war for your kind!”
Ringo: “Bet you’re sorry you won. HehHeh.” -
@njr said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@njr said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
@littlewillow said in Sunny Heights:
@wandy said in Sunny Heights:
I quite agree, but I guess not everyone is a Beatles fan️
@wandy That is true.
The same thing happened to Ringo's Tittenhurst Park Estate. He sold it to an Arab guy called, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, he had no idea about Britain's Listed Buildings laws. These buildings are protected by law/government, and musnt be altered without permission from the authorities. The sultan changed a heck of a lot of stuff there. He got onto trouble with the local council, but it was too late, the damage had already been done. I have often wondered what would have happened if the Beatles had been allowed to keep their mural on the front of the Apple Boutique in Baker Street. I believe now it too would be protected by the government. Oh well
You’re quite right (slick) Look at the mural that was painted on the Empress Pub by Ringo’s old Liverpool home. That wouldn’t have been tolerated in the ‘60s!
Agreed! Problem was ( imho) back in the 1960s, the London councils would have consisted of ( mostly) men who had fought in the second world war, and these "old" men now in their 40s, which would definitely seem old to the Beatles, did not risk their lives fighting in a war so long Haired hippy jumped up unimportant pop stars could paint their stupid ugly hideous drug induced paintings on the side of perfectly good buildings. Just saying like.
“I fought in the war for your kind!”
Ringo: “Bet you’re sorry you won. HehHeh.”Let's leave the Kennel to Lassie. Paul.