Did Paul's Voice Really Change?
-
BOYCIE:
audi:
A niche market, for sure. But I think it would comprise a variety of ages. Myself, I would've loved a station like this when I was in high-school. I've never listened to just one station or one genre, and there are probably more like-minded people than what demographic-research purports. I think there's a loophole somewhere in those numbers.
Baby you're a niche man, baby you're a niche man, baby you're a niche man too! ops:
:
-
(grooooooooooooan)
-
audi:
What do you guys think of this business idea? An internet/air radio-station that plays only newer product by classic artists. I'd say that it's an idea whose time has come.
Even if they can't do that 24x7, dedicate an hour or two everday to your idea which would mix it up. After all, how many times can a classic rock station play "Stairway To Heaven" - lol
-
Yes, his voice has changed. Compare 2007 to 2015:
RMartinez:
I agree, it depends on the night. No criticism intended, generally Paul is doing quite well these days. I'll Follow the Sun was a little shaky vocally and Paul gives Rusty the LOOK when he hits that bum note on the solo to say "Dude! The solo has four notes!!"
Compare the same song a few years back: Still, I think Paul gives it his all, and watching him at the Robin Hood concert reminds me what a pro and pure musician he is. -
yankeefan7:
After all, how many times can a classic rock station play "Stairway To Heaven" - lol
Seven times per hour. Or twice with commercials.
-
-
I've read a few posts pointing out that Paul's is struggling with his voice when he is appearing live. As a flawless musician I'm sure that he is aware too, but music and live performing is what he does so he'll continue as long as people buy tickets and he enjoys it which he clearly still does. Personally I think it's just that he seems to be continuously touring so his voice isn't getting a chance to heal before the next gig comes along. At the end of the day he is doing this for the love of performing to his fans not for money. so all who complain remember he is a genius and a true performer so make the most of his performances while he is still out there being a gigging musician. Oh and as someone who saw him in 1990 on the Tripping the Light Fantastic Tour in Glasgow and the very next day formed my very own Beatles Tribute band, having heard the audience go crazy for the old Beatles hits, I owe him a lot as I had 25 years playing those hits after being so inspired.
-
Nancy R:
You have got to be kidding! Paul's voice, both his speaking and singing, has changed dramatically since around the year 2000 or so. In speaking, it is deeper and more "old man" sounding. He can still belt out the rockers like Helter Skelter, but on the ballads, what a change! He insists on singing everything in the same key as the originals and has to strain (and usually fails) to hit the high notes. Please get on youtube and do some comparisons and you'll see. He doesn't sound the same at all.
I agree. In "Live At The Cavern Club" DVD, his voice was still super fine. But in "Back In The US," it was noticeable that his voice isn't too good anymore. But it's still good today. I just don't like it when he tries to make his voice bigger when singing live. I say he is fortunare to have reached this age singing. I feel sad for the Oasis' lead singer who had totally lost his distinctive voice and had to force himself to sound as if he is in his 20's.
-
Alexlowe123:
I've read a few posts pointing out that Paul's is struggling with his voice when he is appearing live. As a flawless musician I'm sure that he is aware too, but music and live performing is what he does so he'll continue as long as people buy tickets and he enjoys it which he clearly still does. Personally I think it's just that he seems to be continuously touring so his voice isn't getting a chance to heal before the next gig comes along. At the end of the day he is doing this for the love of performing to his fans not for money. so all who complain remember he is a genius and a true performer so make the most of his performances while he is still out there being a gigging musician. Oh and as someone who saw him in 1990 on the Tripping the Light Fantastic Tour in Glasgow and the very next day formed my very own Beatles Tribute band, having heard the audience go crazy for the old Beatles hits, I owe him a lot as I had 25 years playing those hits after being so inspired.
He does love it and is great at it. But he IS doing it for the money. If not, why charge so much? And only play in places where top dollar can be earned?
-
-
i honestly dont think its money, he is doing it because he loves performing. He is playing big venues because he has a massive audience, a massive show, a massive sound system and a massive team of people all relying in him. playing a 200 seater would not satisfy the demand. but on that subject dont forget Paul did play the Cavern at the time of Run Devil Run. Sorry but he is Paul McCartney, who in hundreds of years will be talked about in the same way Beethoven and Motzart are today. The man is a musical genius, enjoy him while you can
-
Alexlowe123:
i honestly dont think its money, he is doing it because he loves performing. He is playing big venues because he has a massive audience, a massive show, a massive sound system and a massive team of people all relying in him. playing a 200 seater would not satisfy the demand. but on that subject dont forget Paul did play the Cavern at the time of Run Devil Run. Sorry but he is Paul McCartney, who in hundreds of years will be talked about in the same way Beethoven and Motzart are today. The man is a musical genius, enjoy him while you can
Charity gigs excluded, it's about meeting his fee. There is no good reason why McCartney has not played "RMartinez's" city.
-
audi:
Alexlowe123:
i honestly dont think its money, he is doing it because he loves performing. He is playing big venues because he has a massive audience, a massive show, a massive sound system and a massive team of people all relying in him. playing a 200 seater would not satisfy the demand. but on that subject dont forget Paul did play the Cavern at the time of Run Devil Run. Sorry but he is Paul McCartney, who in hundreds of years will be talked about in the same way Beethoven and Motzart are today. The man is a musical genius, enjoy him while you can
Charity gigs excluded, it's about meeting his fee. There is no good reason why McCartney has not played "RMartinez's" city.
Amen, Bro!
-
Alexlowe123:
i honestly dont think its money, he is doing it because he loves performing. He is playing big venues because he has a massive audience, a massive show, a massive sound system and a massive team of people all relying in him. playing a 200 seater would not satisfy the demand. but on that subject dont forget Paul did play the Cavern at the time of Run Devil Run. Sorry but he is Paul McCartney, who in hundreds of years will be talked about in the same way Beethoven and Motzart are today. The man is a musical genius, enjoy him while you can
I have enjoyed him, I have seen him live eight times between 1976 and 2009. And I am certainly glad I did. Clearly he doesn't NEED the money, but, again, it is very optimistic to say "Paul does not do it for the money, he does it just for the joy of it." If that were the case, he would charge just enough to pay his band and crew and do it just for the love of it, and not get paid himself. But that is not what he is doing. That he is a genius and will be remembered fondly in 100 years has nothing to do with it. But you are correct, he is Paul McCartney, he can do what he wants. And I know exactly what he is doing!
-
Paul McCartney deserves to be paid. But the absurdity is that $1 million for a gig ain't worth his time.
-
all musicians deserve to be paid and appreciated for their art. i would love to see Paul appear in my local village hall but it ain't gonna happen. Unless I win the UK lottery and can afford to pay his fee. Now there's an idea, I'm off to purchase a ticket.
-
Alexlowe123:
all musicians deserve to be paid and appreciated for their art. i would love to see Paul appear in my local village hall but it ain't gonna happen. Unless I win the UK lottery and can afford to pay his fee. Now there's an idea, I'm off to purchase a ticket.
He does deserve to be paid. That's my point. He does do it for the money too. Cool. If you win, buy a Paul show in New Mexico! Or subsidize one!
-
I will RMartinez, how cool would that be!
-
Alexlowe123:
I will RMartinez, how cool would that be!
Very. But I am very glad I got to see him the times I did, he is amazing! Hey, even if he never comes back again, he did one show in New Mexico, and that is better than no show.
-
Absolutely, God bless his cotton socks.