Where's Paul been lately?
-
oobu24 wrote:
They must have stopped & bought her a new outfit?
I didn't even notice!
Sharp eyes Little Willow!
Here's the article where I first saw the pics:
-
Little_Willow_ wrote:
It doesn't look like the same woman in the two photos. The way they are dressed is disturbing.
It's Paul's wife in both photos. Why do you say the way they are dressed is disturbing? *confused*.
-
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
It doesn't look like the same woman in the two photos. The way they are dressed is disturbing.
It's Paul's wife in both photos. Why do you say the way they are dressed is disturbing? *confused*.
It's that in the first photo I have the impression that the woman is much younger than Mr McCartney's wife. Whereas in the second one I have no doubts.
I think it was her hair that confused me as well as the face mask. -
Nancy R wrote:
oobu24 wrote:
They must have stopped & bought her a new outfit?
I didn't even notice!
Sharp eyes Little Willow!
Here's the article where I first saw the pics:
Thank you Nancy R:)
-
Little_Willow_ wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
It doesn't look like the same woman in the two photos. The way they are dressed is disturbing.
It's Paul's wife in both photos. Why do you say the way they are dressed is disturbing? *confused*.
It's that in the first photo I have the impression that the woman is much younger than Mr McCartney's wife. Whereas in the second one I have no doubts.
I think it was her hair that confused me as well as the face mask.She definitely looks younger than 61!
-
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
It doesn't look like the same woman in the two photos. The way they are dressed is disturbing.
It's Paul's wife in both photos. Why do you say the way they are dressed is disturbing? *confused*.
It's that in the first photo I have the impression that the woman is much younger than Mr McCartney's wife. Whereas in the second one I have no doubts.
I think it was her hair that confused me as well as the face mask.She definitely looks younger than 61!
Yes I agree with you.
-
To me it looks like they are wearing almost the same clothes. The second one of Nancy is wearing the same sweater, and is missing the blouse and adding a hat. Maybe she got warm and took the blouse off. Nancy always looks great, she is very photogenic.
-
love2travel wrote:
To me it looks like they are wearing almost the same clothes. The second one of Nancy is wearing the same sweater, and is missing the blouse and adding a hat. Maybe she got warm and took the blouse off. Nancy always looks great, she is very photogenic.
Her pants are different.
-
oobu24 wrote:
love2travel wrote:
To me it looks like they are wearing almost the same clothes. The second one of Nancy is wearing the same sweater, and is missing the blouse and adding a hat. Maybe she got warm and took the blouse off. Nancy always looks great, she is very photogenic.
Her pants are different.
And the black top looks slightly different (the material) but could be the same.
-
It looks like Paul was holding a pair of slip over type of pants for her. Then she tucked everything in. Where is her ring in one of the photos? Something looks out of place - perhaps some photoshopping? Things like them holding hands with one hand missing. A line running next to them in the same area. Ha ha I am probably reading too much into it. I know... she is a decoy or a double until the real Nancy could catch up. Forgive me, I was just having fun with this. Carry on.
-
The_Fool wrote:
It looks like Paul was holding a pair of slip over type of pants for her. Then she tucked everything in. Where is her ring in one of the photos? Something looks out of place - perhaps some photoshopping? Things like them holding hands with one hand missing. A line running next to them in the same area. Ha ha I am probably reading too much into it. I know... she is a decoy or a double until the real Nancy could catch up. Forgive me, I was just having fun with this. Carry on.
Ah, yes. I hadn't thought of that. It's an original idea. Thanks The_Fool.
-
Eh, but you are right The_Fool. There are many differences. The wedding ring is not on his finger in the second photo. But on the other hand, in the first picture, Mr. McCartney is not holding a pair of trousers. He's holding a bag. I don't know if he's holding a handbag or a shopping bag. I'm leaning towards the handbag.
I also noticed that in the first photo, Nancy has a hole in her jeans. -
Maybe they took her ring in to be resized. Here's another pic from that article but it doesn't add anything as far as clues.
-
The_Fool wrote:
It looks like Paul was holding a pair of slip over type of pants for her. Then she tucked everything in. Where is her ring in one of the photos? Something looks out of place - perhaps some photoshopping? Things like them holding hands with one hand missing. A line running next to them in the same area. Ha ha I am probably reading too much into it. I know... she is a decoy or a double until the real Nancy could catch up. Forgive me, I was just having fun with this. Carry on.
ROTFLMAO! What you can see of Paul's hand holding hers looks deformed!
-
Little_Willow_ wrote:
Eh, but you are right The_Fool. There are many differences. The wedding ring is not on his finger in the second photo. But on the other hand, in the first picture, Mr. McCartney is not holding a pair of trousers. He's holding a bag. I don't know if he's holding a handbag or a shopping bag. I'm leaning towards the handbag.
I also noticed that in the first photo, Nancy has a hole in her jeans.It is Nancy who is not wearing her ring in the one photo, but is in the other (you said "his finger" but maybe you meant to say "her finger.") And Paul is holding a black shopping bag that probably contains one of the items she later changed in to. Or maybe something else, who knows?
The hole in the jeans is "high fashion!" They are sold that way. I would never buy, certainly not at age 61!
-
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
Eh, but you are right The_Fool. There are many differences. The wedding ring is not on his finger in the second photo. But on the other hand, in the first picture, Mr. McCartney is not holding a pair of trousers. He's holding a bag. I don't know if he's holding a handbag or a shopping bag. I'm leaning towards the handbag.
I also noticed that in the first photo, Nancy has a hole in her jeans.It is Nancy who is not wearing her ring in the one photo, but is in the other (you said "his finger" but maybe you meant to say "her finger.") And Paul is holding a black shopping bag that probably contains one of the items she later changed in to. Or maybe something else, who knows?
The hole in the jeans is "high fashion!" They are sold that way. I would never buy, certainly not at age 61!
I did type in her and spell check changed it (but still I did not check it again). I probably typed h...I... r ... for her and it changed it to his. I don't think they changed pants, they just slipped on an additional pair.
As for the hole in the jeans ... they sell them that way ... I tell people I don't buy them .... I can make the holes myself just by wearing them and doing stuff around the house. I started out by poking fun at this thread and here I am in it and talking about it ... ha ha ... oh well. -
Yes, I know that jeans with holes in them are fashionable and cost a lot of money. It's not really my style. But to each his own.
-
The_Fool wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
Eh, but you are right The_Fool. There are many differences. The wedding ring is not on his finger in the second photo. But on the other hand, in the first picture, Mr. McCartney is not holding a pair of trousers. He's holding a bag. I don't know if he's holding a handbag or a shopping bag. I'm leaning towards the handbag.
I also noticed that in the first photo, Nancy has a hole in her jeans.It is Nancy who is not wearing her ring in the one photo, but is in the other (you said "his finger" but maybe you meant to say "her finger.") And Paul is holding a black shopping bag that probably contains one of the items she later changed in to. Or maybe something else, who knows?
The hole in the jeans is "high fashion!" They are sold that way. I would never buy, certainly not at age 61!
I did type in her and spell check changed it (but still I did not check it again). I probably typed h...I... r ... for her and it changed it to his. I don't think they changed pants, they just slipped on an additional pair.
As for the hole in the jeans ... they sell them that way ... I tell people I don't buy them .... I can make the holes myself just by wearing them and doing stuff around the house. I started out by poking fun at this thread and here I am in it and talking about it ... ha ha ... oh well.Why is Little Willow's answer coming from The Fool? *very confused* Was quoting Little Willow's post, not The Fool's which was correct (her)
And no way did she put one pair of pants over another. She just changed clothes.
-
Nancy R wrote:
The_Fool wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Little_Willow_ wrote:
Eh, but you are right The_Fool. There are many differences. The wedding ring is not on his finger in the second photo. But on the other hand, in the first picture, Mr. McCartney is not holding a pair of trousers. He's holding a bag. I don't know if he's holding a handbag or a shopping bag. I'm leaning towards the handbag.
I also noticed that in the first photo, Nancy has a hole in her jeans.It is Nancy who is not wearing her ring in the one photo, but is in the other (you said "his finger" but maybe you meant to say "her finger.") And Paul is holding a black shopping bag that probably contains one of the items she later changed in to. Or maybe something else, who knows?
The hole in the jeans is "high fashion!" They are sold that way. I would never buy, certainly not at age 61!
I did type in her and spell check changed it (but still I did not check it again). I probably typed h...I... r ... for her and it changed it to his. I don't think they changed pants, they just slipped on an additional pair.
As for the hole in the jeans ... they sell them that way ... I tell people I don't buy them .... I can make the holes myself just by wearing them and doing stuff around the house. I started out by poking fun at this thread and here I am in it and talking about it ... ha ha ... oh well.Why is Little Willow's answer coming from The Fool? *very confused* Was quoting Little Willow's post, not The Fool's which was correct (her)
And no way did she put one pair of pants over another. She just changed clothes.
Because maybe The_Fool thought it was directed at him. I don't know. It's a suggestion.
-
Oooops I goofed.