http://www.examiner.com/article/paul-mccartney-plays-shortened-set-for-charity-at-tiny-uk-pub

Um, folks, according to McCartney's press office, he played none of the rarities, just a shortened regular set list. I asked for confirmation and was told the list I got was correct. It'll be posted soon.

Tribute to Wings at Paris show http://www.examiner.com/article/marriage-proposal-fan-tribute-to-wings-highlights-of-mccartney-paris-concert

nobodytoldme:

ificandream:

[..] It's easy to say being anonymous and sitting behind a keyboard, but that doesn't mean it's true. It wasn't all over the place.

Fair enough. It wasn't for those who just await to copy-paste press releases for some clicks without doing some own research while there are real-time reports on Twitter, fan forums, and even live streaming through Periscope.

Your trolling is noted.

nobodytoldme:

ificandream:

nobodytoldme:

ificandream:

nobodytoldme:

Beatles "Examiner" at it again... "Here's the confirmed set list for the first Buenos Aires show as provided by Paul McCartney's press office: It was the same as the previous show." No, it wasn't, one glance at The Internet would show you otherwise. Journalism these days...

As I wrote to someone else here, "Get Back" wasn't listed on the information I got from Paul's office. As for "journalism these days," at least someone (me) is covering the tour nightly. https://beatlesheadlines.blogspot.com/2016/03/paul-mccartney-one-on-one-tour-story.html

That's my point, why don't do a little bit of research yourself then, instead of copy-pasting press releases. The only moment from that night which would justify an article would've been exactly the thing you didn't cover, which was hardly low-key on social media.

Paul's office is accurate with the setlist 99 percent of the time. There was no reason to suspect otherwise and nothing really showed up until the next day. And I did cover it and quite better than most did. http://www.examiner.com/article/see-10-year-old-girl-play-bass-with-paul-mccartney-charm-crowd-buenos-aires

How humble. Nah, it was just lazy copy-pasting. Why don't just do some investigation yourself then. It was all over the place at social media, and the only moment which justified an article on the gig. Hell, the video of that moment already got uploaded when the concert was barely over. That's a huge omission if you go all-out saying the set was the same.

It's easy to say being anonymous and sitting behind a keyboard, but that doesn't mean it's true. It wasn't all over the place.

nobodytoldme:

ificandream:

nobodytoldme:

Beatles "Examiner" at it again... "Here's the confirmed set list for the first Buenos Aires show as provided by Paul McCartney's press office: It was the same as the previous show." No, it wasn't, one glance at The Internet would show you otherwise. Journalism these days...

As I wrote to someone else here, "Get Back" wasn't listed on the information I got from Paul's office. As for "journalism these days," at least someone (me) is covering the tour nightly. https://beatlesheadlines.blogspot.com/2016/03/paul-mccartney-one-on-one-tour-story.html

That's my point, why don't do a little bit of research yourself then, instead of copy-pasting press releases. The only moment from that night which would justify an article would've been exactly the thing you didn't cover, which was hardly low-key on social media.

Paul's office is accurate with the setlist 99 percent of the time. There was no reason to suspect otherwise and nothing really showed up until the next day. And I did cover it and quite better than most did. http://www.examiner.com/article/see-10-year-old-girl-play-bass-with-paul-mccartney-charm-crowd-buenos-aires

nobodytoldme:

Beatles "Examiner" at it again... "Here's the confirmed set list for the first Buenos Aires show as provided by Paul McCartney's press office: It was the same as the previous show." No, it wasn't, one glance at The Internet would show you otherwise. Journalism these days...

As I wrote to someone else here, "Get Back" wasn't listed on the information I got from Paul's office. As for "journalism these days," at least someone (me) is covering the tour nightly. https://beatlesheadlines.blogspot.com/2016/03/paul-mccartney-one-on-one-tour-story.html

5th-beatle:

nobodytoldme:

Beatles "Examiner" at it again... "Here's the confirmed set list for the first Buenos Aires show as provided by Paul McCartney's press office: It was the same as the previous show." No, it wasn't, one glance at The Internet would show you otherwise. Journalism these days...

Here is a picture of the setlist originally intended for the first show in La Plata. It does not include "Get Back", which was added by Paul when Leila asked to play bass with him. Maybe that Beatles Examiner website looked at this piece of paper and forgot to include the extra song. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CitQyWyXEAA0dld.jpg

The setlist Paul's people sent me did not have "Get Back" in it. It may have been a last minute substitution.

And I asked Paul's reps about the Sun story... http://ow.ly/XSevd

Just published a round up of Wogan's interviews with George, Paul and Ringo, plus Cynthia Lennon. http://www.examiner.com/list/looking-back-at-some-of-terry-wogan-s-historic-beatles-interviews