The Paul McCartney Picture Thread
-
Nancy R wrote:
I read earlier that it was Easter, which in 1969 was Apr. 6th for Catholics and Apr. 13th for Orthodox. Whatever that means!
No idea. No reason why the photo couldn't have been taken in April although I think we have to assume that the photographer couldn't have seen Linda's wedding ring before? We might have to try and match up the photo of Paul with the 'Beatles' photos taken in April to compare his hairstyle.
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
I read earlier that it was Easter, which in 1969 was Apr. 6th for Catholics and Apr. 13th for Orthodox. Whatever that means!
No idea. No reason why the photo couldn't have been taken in April although I think we have to assume that the photographer couldn't have seen Linda's wedding ring before? We might have to try and match up the photo of Paul with the 'Beatles' photos taken in April to compare his hairstyle.
It looks longer than in March at their wedding.
Hey, got to tell you something - my BFF in Nashville emailed me, oobu and Lady Leslie about the Wings Fun Club which she had never heard of, but found about it through reading Angie McCartney's book. Told her it was from the U.K. Googled it and what should pop up but a post of yours here on the Maccaboard from 2007!!
https://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/forum/thread/19671?page=1
-
Nancy R wrote:
It looks longer than in March at their wedding.
Told her it was from the U.K. Googled it and what should pop up but a post of yours here on the Maccaboard from 2007!!
It looks a lot longer than the Beatles 9th April photo session too so maybe the family photo was from later that Spring as you originally suggested?
Ugh, I remember writing that post.....and to think 13 years have passed by since then.
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
It looks longer than in March at their wedding.
Told her it was from the U.K. Googled it and what should pop up but a post of yours here on the Maccaboard from 2007!!
It looks a lot longer than the Beatles 9th April photo session too so maybe the family photo was from later that Spring as you originally suggested?
Ugh, I remember writing that post.....and to think 13 years have passed by since then.
Time flies when you're having fun!
And you're right - Paul's hair had been cut shorter by Apr. 9, 1969 famous photoshoot! So the pic has to be prior to that or much later in the summer. By Aug. 22nd photoshoot it was long in the back, but shorter in the front.
April 9th:
Aug. 22nd:
-
-
The balloon photos are so adorable... I am definitely going to print those out!!! What event was this?
-
love2travel wrote:
The balloon photos are so adorable... I am definitely going to print those out!!! What event was this?
The Our World satellite show (All You Need Is Love) party/press reception in June, 1967. The show was live on June 25th.
-
-
Nancy R wrote:
https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/v319/njr/7F10A78C_DF19_4060_97F3_E491D036C093.jpeg
Great photo, Nancy! He's just so doggone cute...
-
-
-
-
LadyLeslie wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/v319/njr/7F10A78C_DF19_4060_97F3_E491D036C093.jpeg
Great photo, Nancy! He's just so doggone cute...
That is a really cute pic on the drums
Really nice article with Taylor Swift. I like her Folklore album, the Cardigan video was very cool.
-
Paul's birth certificate sold at auction
-
Nancy R wrote:
Paul's birth certificate sold at auction
That isn't the original birth certicate but a copy issued in (judging by the date) 196? (I can't make out the final digit). I suppose if Paul owned the copy then it gives it extra value but really anyone can order a copy of his birth certificate on-line if they wanted one.
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Paul's birth certificate sold at auction
That isn't the original birth certicate but a copy issued in (judging by the date) 196? (I can't make out the final digit). I suppose if Paul owned the copy then it gives it extra value but really anyone can order a copy of his birth certificate on-line if they wanted one.
I know. I was waiting for you or someone to catch that! (I think it says 1968) Angie McCartney sold the original which led to the rift between them.
-
Nancy R wrote:
I know. I was waiting for you or someone to catch that! (I think it says 1968) Angie McCartney sold the original which led to the rift between them.
Did even Angie have the original? I thought the original was lost when Paul was still a child?
-
If she did sell the original that was really mean.
-
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
I know. I was waiting for you or someone to catch that! (I think it says 1968) Angie McCartney sold the original which led to the rift between them.
Did even Angie have the original? I thought the original was lost when Paul was still a child?
Yes, I would assume it was amongst Jim's papers and she sold it. That's what I heard, anyway.