Beatles Sons and Daughters Picture Thread
-
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
-
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
-
RMartinez:
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
Oh .... Mary....
-
RMartinez:
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
When I met him, what struck me was how much shorter he was to what I would have expected. I'm 5'10 and he was no taller than me. And just generally, he was small. His frame is tiny!
-
moptops:
RMartinez:
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
When I met him, what struck me was how much shorter he was to what I would have expected. I'm 5'10 and he was no taller than me. And just generally, he was small. His frame is tiny!
The Beatles were/are not big guys. They gave skinny runts like me new hope!
-
RMartinez:
moptops:
RMartinez:
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
When I met him, what struck me was how much shorter he was to what I would have expected. I'm 5'10 and he was no taller than me. And just generally, he was small. His frame is tiny!
The Beatles were/are not big guys. They gave skinny runts like me new hope!
It's comments like this when you have to type slowly and carefully!
-
Julian 1992
and one labelled as Julian and Zak http://40.media.tumblr.com/05f08aced782da83a7bbc9da4acc0066/tumblr_moaynavngx1qbfx5ho1_500.png
-
-
-
-
moptops:
RMartinez:
moptops:
RMartinez:
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
When I met him, what struck me was how much shorter he was to what I would have expected. I'm 5'10 and he was no taller than me. And just generally, he was small. His frame is tiny!
The Beatles were/are not big guys. They gave skinny runts like me new hope!
It's comments like this when you have to type slowly and carefully!
Only if you think about it a certain way!
-
RMartinez:
moptops:
JoeySmith:
oobu24:
Didnt realize Mary was so tall. Paul is about 6' 1" I believe.
Paul is tiny these days. 5'10...probably.
Hasn't he always been 5'10"? None of the Beatles were over 6' tall. Also, the ladies are wearing high heels in this photo.
What is it about Paul??? He's always been 5'10" and even now he's still 9 months older than George .....
I'm really enjoying all these photos of sons and daughters. It's wonderful to have such beautiful Beatle DNA still in the universe. And Mary is simply stunning!
-
...Mary...
-
[quote="Eeee Cor Blimey"]Julian 1992
and one labelled as Julian and Zak http//40.media.tumblr.com/05f08aced782da83a7bbc9da4acc0066/tumblr_moaynavngx1qbfx5ho1_500.png OMG...bungie jumping!! And that looks like Zak. He is 2 1/2 years younger than Julian.
-
-
-
No picture I'm afraid but there was a photo in (I think) the Daily Mail today of James & Jason together, taken in London last night.
-
Kestrel:
No picture I'm afraid but there was a photo in (I think) the Daily Mail today of James & Jason together, taken in London last night.
I found it on getty images, but as they often don't let you link i've uploaded it myself
This is the pic, from the 16th Sept it says.
-
Nice detective work!
-
Jason looks a lot like his dad I think. Wish James would smile more!