PAUL AND NANCY ARE MARRIED!
-
ninaseltaeb:
oobu24:
Kathryn O:
Snorckle:
herc:
i wonder did he read any messages from this thread?
By the sound of the news item on the main website, I reckon he did!
I thought the same thing. and it seemed he rather enjoyed them too. See, Paul, we can be nice when we want to be and not scarey.
sometimes...
What are you guys on about?? I'm not SCAREY?!! Speak for yourselves
-
well I say that Snorckle is very loving and kind never scary at any time! hehe!!
-
maccalindandme:
well I say that Snorckle is very loving and kind never scary at any time! hehe!!
Well you would!!
-
maccalindandme:
well I say that Snorckle is very loving and kind never scary at any time! hehe!!
yes yes i agree he is not scarey at all
-
herc:
maccalindandme:
well I say that Snorckle is very loving and kind never scary at any time! hehe!!
yes yes i agree he is not scarey at all
No Herc SHE is not!
-
Snorckle:
herc:
maccalindandme:
well I say that Snorckle is very loving and kind never scary at any time! hehe!!
yes yes i agree he is not scarey at all
No Herc SHE is not!
i was 50% sure that you were a woman
-
herc:
Snorckle:
herc:
maccalindandme:
well I say that Snorckle is very loving and kind never scary at any time! hehe!!
yes yes i agree he is not scarey at all
No Herc SHE is not!
i was 50% sure that you were a woman
-
Snorckle:
ninaseltaeb:
oobu24:
Kathryn O:
Snorckle:
herc:
i wonder did he read any messages from this thread?
By the sound of the news item on the main website, I reckon he did!
I thought the same thing. and it seemed he rather enjoyed them too. See, Paul, we can be nice when we want to be and not scarey.
sometimes...
What are you guys on about?? I'm not SCAREY?!! Speak for yourselves
I think KO is speaking for herself. It was not implied that anyone specific was scarey. BUT I think we all are...a little bit! 2:
-
oobu24:
Snorckle:
ninaseltaeb:
oobu24:
Kathryn O:
Snorckle:
herc:
i wonder did he read any messages from this thread?
By the sound of the news item on the main website, I reckon he did!
I thought the same thing. and it seemed he rather enjoyed them too. See, Paul, we can be nice when we want to be and not scarey.
sometimes...
What are you guys on about?? I'm not SCAREY?!! Speak for yourselves
Well I suppose, when it comes to ticket sales! I think KO is speaking for herself. It was not implied that anyone specific was scarey. BUT I think we all are...a little bit! 2:
-
I finally got around to watching Barbara Walters on The View talking about the wedding. First, she says that Paul & Linda were married 23 years (instead of 29), then she says that Nancy's Mom Arlene was her first cousin and Nancy is her 2nd cousin. Again, wrong. Barbara's daughter and Nancy would be 2nd cousins. Nancy is Barbara's first cousin, once removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin http://ourancestry.com/cousins.html
-
Nancy R:
I finally got around to watching Barbara Walters on The View talking about the wedding. First, she says that Paul & Linda were married 23 years (instead of 29), then she says that Nancy's Mom Arlene was her first cousin and Nancy is her 2nd cousin. Again, wrong. Barbara's daughter and Nancy would be 2nd cousins. Nancy is Barbara's first cousin, once removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin http://ourancestry.com/cousins.html
What does that phrase 'once removed' mean?
-
I read a really nice article about their honeymoon destination the other day. It wasn't intrusive at all. And for once! didn't refer to Paul and Nancy as 'the former Beatle' or 'the american heiress' That has been getting on my nerves!
-
Nancy R:
I finally got around to watching Barbara Walters on The View talking about the wedding. First, she says that Paul & Linda were married 23 years (instead of 29), then she says that Nancy's Mom Arlene was her first cousin and Nancy is her 2nd cousin. Again, wrong. Barbara's daughter and Nancy would be 2nd cousins. Nancy is Barbara's first cousin, once removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin http://ourancestry.com/cousins.html
my brain is burned!
-
Kathryn O:
Nancy R:
I finally got around to watching Barbara Walters on The View talking about the wedding. First, she says that Paul & Linda were married 23 years (instead of 29), then she says that Nancy's Mom Arlene was her first cousin and Nancy is her 2nd cousin. Again, wrong. Barbara's daughter and Nancy would be 2nd cousins. Nancy is Barbara's first cousin, once removed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin http://ourancestry.com/cousins.html
What does that phrase 'once removed' mean?
Okay, think about one of your first cousins. Now think about that first cousin's child. That child is "once (one time or one generation) removed" from you. Did you click on the links I posted? It's all explained.
-
Snorckle:
I read a really nice article about their honeymoon destination the other day. It wasn't intrusive at all. And for once! didn't refer to Paul and Nancy as 'the former Beatle' or 'the american heiress' That has been getting on my nerves!
yes that really gets on my nerves too! why can't they all just "LET IT BE"! hehe! pun on words there! i Unitrusive to me is Wonderful! I say they deserve a Private Life too! where did you read this nice article?
-
I think they are happy on their honeymoon because the silence is taking place and the stirr of smiles is still in place love doris
-
Snorckle:
I read a really nice article about their honeymoon destination the other day. It wasn't intrusive at all. And for once! didn't refer to Paul and Nancy as 'the former Beatle' or 'the american heiress' That has been getting on my nerves!
The 'heiress' parts get on my nerves because it demeans all the work Nancy did in her lifetime in a hard field as a woman and succeeded.
-
maccalindandme:
Snorckle:
I read a really nice article about their honeymoon destination the other day. It wasn't intrusive at all. And for once! didn't refer to Paul and Nancy as 'the former Beatle' or 'the american heiress' That has been getting on my nerves!
yes that really gets on my nerves too! why can't they all just "LET IT BE"! hehe! pun on words there! i Unitrusive to me is Wonderful! I say they deserve a Private Life too! where did you read this nice article?
Sunday Mirror: Sunday 16th October. http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2011/10/16/paul-mccartney-and-bride-nancy-shevell-honeymoon-at-mick-jagger-s-private-island-retreat-in-mustique-115875-23491317/
-
Snorckle:
maccalindandme:
Snorckle:
I read a really nice article about their honeymoon destination the other day. It wasn't intrusive at all. And for once! didn't refer to Paul and Nancy as 'the former Beatle' or 'the american heiress' That has been getting on my nerves!
yes that really gets on my nerves too! why can't they all just "LET IT BE"! hehe! pun on words there! i Unitrusive to me is Wonderful! I say they deserve a Private Life too! where did you read this nice article?
Sunday Mirror: Sunday 16th October. http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2011/10/16/paul-mccartney-and-bride-nancy-shevell-honeymoon-at-mick-jagger-s-private-island-retreat-in-mustique-115875-23491317/
That pic of P&N was not current. It was from earlier this year.
-
oobu24:
Snorckle:
maccalindandme:
Snorckle:
I read a really nice article about their honeymoon destination the other day. It wasn't intrusive at all. And for once! didn't refer to Paul and Nancy as 'the former Beatle' or 'the american heiress' That has been getting on my nerves!
yes that really gets on my nerves too! why can't they all just "LET IT BE"! hehe! pun on words there! i Unitrusive to me is Wonderful! I say they deserve a Private Life too! where did you read this nice article?
Sunday Mirror: Sunday 16th October. http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2011/10/16/paul-mccartney-and-bride-nancy-shevell-honeymoon-at-mick-jagger-s-private-island-retreat-in-mustique-115875-23491317/
That pic of P&N was not current. It was from earlier this year.
Probably, because they said it was a 'paparazzi free island'