The Nancy Shevell Appreciation Thread
-
Wasn't that how Michael Ja......oo no, perhaps not!
-
oobu24:
david mitchelson:
Wasn't that how Michael Ja......oo no, perhaps not!
-
oobu24:
They were giving doctored up lemonade to the kiddies so that they could get some alone time!
Mother's Little Helper, indeed!
-
Moderator Post Hi All, With regard to posting pictures of Paul and his family, very specifically his minor daughter: We, the moderators and administrators, are not permitted to allow any unauthorized pictures of Paul's minor daughter to be posted here at the message board. Whether or not the image of Paul's minor daughter may or may not be found in abundance on the Internet holds no bearing on our decision to remove the image here. This is a matter relating to the security of Paul and his family, the moderators and administrators will continue to uphold our obligation to remove such images here at Paul's official message board. Please note the following that may be found within our forum guidelines: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=14764 Post Content and Privacy Please respect Paul's privacy and that of his family. Please don't post any details or images in relation to any of Paul's addresses or any links to any sources which may display these. Post content deemed inaccurate or derogatory towards Paul or any of his family is subject to removal (this includes direct links to and quotes from sources which contain content of a private or personal nature). Please note the following from our forum guidelines which specifically addresses this issue: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=36208 Privacy Please keep posts related to Paul's work and not his private life. Please respect Paul's privacy and that of his family. Any articles, information, comments, or photographs deemed inappropriate will be removed?even if they appear on other websites. Please do not post any unauthorised pictures of Paul's family. Hope this explanation provides a better understanding as to why images of Paul's minor daughter have been removed from this message board.
-
Triplets Love Paul:
Moderator Post Hi All, With regard to posting pictures of Paul and his family, very specifically his minor daughter: We, the moderators and administrators, are not permitted to allow any unauthorized pictures of Paul's minor daughter to be posted here at the message board. Whether or not the image of Paul's minor daughter may or may not be found in abundance on the Internet holds no bearing on our decision to remove the image here. This is a matter relating to the security of Paul and his family, the moderators and administrators will continue to uphold our obligation to remove such images here at Paul's official message board. Please note the following that may be found within our forum guidelines: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=14764 Post Content and Privacy Please respect Paul's privacy and that of his family. Please don't post any details or images in relation to any of Paul's addresses or any links to any sources which may display these. Post content deemed inaccurate or derogatory towards Paul or any of his family is subject to removal (this includes direct links to and quotes from sources which contain content of a private or personal nature). Please note the following from our forum guidelines which specifically addresses this issue: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=36208 Privacy Please keep posts related to Paul's work and not his private life. Please respect Paul's privacy and that of his family. Any articles, information, comments, or photographs deemed inappropriate will be removed?even if they appear on other websites. Please do not post any unauthorised pictures of Paul's family. Hope this explanation provides a better understanding as to why images of Paul's minor daughter have been removed from this message board.
Was the wedding photo in question of Bea? Because that makes more sense--I was worried that NO wedding photos at all were allowed.
-
walliebaby:
Was the wedding photo in question of Bea? Because that makes more sense--I was worried that NO wedding photos at all were allowed.
Yes, this is the reason for the image removal.
-
Triplets Love Paul:
walliebaby:
Was the wedding photo in question of Bea? Because that makes more sense--I was worried that NO wedding photos at all were allowed.
Yes, this is the reason for the image removal.
Ah, okay. I'd posted wedding photos in another thread, and was worried I was breaking the rules.
-
im glad thats been cleared up at last..and yes i agree with the 'mods' eventuall stance on this. i find it very disstasteful the way many appear to thrust their children into the spotlight....paul has done his best to let his daughter live an innocent life,without the distractions of his fame...he's a good parent thats for sure.
-
lazydynamite88:
im glad thats been cleared up at last..and yes i agree with the 'mods' eventuall stance on this. i find it very disstasteful the way many appear to thrust their children into the spotlight....paul has done his best to let his daughter live an innocent life,without the distractions of his fame...he's a good parent thats for sure.
He was very clear about getting Bea to run up the steps into the venue while he and Nancy posed, as well, which I thought was a good move. He's never really put his minor children in the spotlight, which is very good of him.
-
walliebaby:
lazydynamite88:
im glad thats been cleared up at last..and yes i agree with the 'mods' eventuall stance on this. i find it very disstasteful the way many appear to thrust their children into the spotlight....paul has done his best to let his daughter live an innocent life,without the distractions of his fame...he's a good parent thats for sure.
He was very clear about getting Bea to run up the steps into the venue while he and Nancy posed, as well, which I thought was a good move. He's never really put his minor children in the spotlight, which is very good of him.
yes hes a class act alright. of course his kids where kind of in the spotlight in the 1970s however it was a much more innocent era. it actually even makes you wanna cut the guy some slack for dying his hair at 70...its not just for him...its for his daughter too..he obviously dosent wanna look like all her classmates grandads!......i think paul is a brilliant father in every way.
-
lazydynamite88:
walliebaby:
lazydynamite88:
im glad thats been cleared up at last..and yes i agree with the 'mods' eventuall stance on this. i find it very disstasteful the way many appear to thrust their children into the spotlight....paul has done his best to let his daughter live an innocent life,without the distractions of his fame...he's a good parent thats for sure.
He was very clear about getting Bea to run up the steps into the venue while he and Nancy posed, as well, which I thought was a good move. He's never really put his minor children in the spotlight, which is very good of him.
yes hes a class act alright. of course his kids where kind of in the spotlight in the 1970s however it was a much more innocent era. it actually even makes you wanna cut the guy some slack for dying his hair at 70...its not just for him...its for his daughter too..he obviously dosent wanna look like all her classmates grandads!......i think paul is a brilliant father in every way.
When you take the family on tour, you get all of the tour baggage like photographers, etc. as well. However, I think he did the right thing by keeping them all together, as I'm sure it brought the family closer together, as well. Totally agree with your post.
-
walliebaby:
Triplets Love Paul:
walliebaby:
Was the wedding photo in question of Bea? Because that makes more sense--I was worried that NO wedding photos at all were allowed.
Yes, this is the reason for the image removal.
Ah, okay. I'd posted wedding photos in another thread, and was worried I was breaking the rules.
Meant to add that the reason for the image removal was made clear within the post that contained the removed image. That post may be found here: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=2607733#2607733
calicoskych2001:
A picture of Paul's youngest child has been removed for privacy reasons.
-
hey_kittay:
Kathryn O:
hey_kittay:
Yeah, I dig her look. She has this bohemian thing going on. Totally what I would wear if I could afford it.
True Bohemian style is very inexpensive. Paying too much for it is part of a person wishing to be something they're not really but looking like they are. But Nancy does usually look good
Oh yeah Kathryn, you are so right. I mean I must be a True Bohemian, cause I dress that way, but don't have alot of money to spend. It would be nice to have a few groovy bohemian looks that are designer though. It surely can't hurt for Stella to dress you.
True Bohemians are into three things: Beauty, truth and love. You must practice all three to be a true bohoemian. Looking like one isn't enough.
-
walliebaby:
lazydynamite88:
im glad thats been cleared up at last..and yes i agree with the 'mods' eventuall stance on this. i find it very disstasteful the way many appear to thrust their children into the spotlight....paul has done his best to let his daughter live an innocent life,without the distractions of his fame...he's a good parent thats for sure.
He was very clear about getting Bea to run up the steps into the venue while he and Nancy posed, as well, which I thought was a good move. He's never really put his minor children in the spotlight, which is very good of him.
But neither has he shielded them (as a certain MJ did) anywhere. They are & were always photographed. (with no scarfs over their faces)
-
Triplets Love Paul:
walliebaby:
Triplets Love Paul:
walliebaby:
Was the wedding photo in question of Bea? Because that makes more sense--I was worried that NO wedding photos at all were allowed.
Yes, this is the reason for the image removal.
Ah, okay. I'd posted wedding photos in another thread, and was worried I was breaking the rules.
Meant to add that the reason for the image removal was made clear within the post that contained the removed image. That post may be found here: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=2607733#2607733
calicoskych2001:
A picture of Paul's youngest child has been removed for privacy reasons.
no problem, I understand...I won't post it again.
-
^ Thank you, Lynda - very much appreciated!
-
oobu24:
walliebaby:
lazydynamite88:
im glad thats been cleared up at last..and yes i agree with the 'mods' eventuall stance on this. i find it very disstasteful the way many appear to thrust their children into the spotlight....paul has done his best to let his daughter live an innocent life,without the distractions of his fame...he's a good parent thats for sure.
He was very clear about getting Bea to run up the steps into the venue while he and Nancy posed, as well, which I thought was a good move. He's never really put his minor children in the spotlight, which is very good of him.
But neither has he shielded them (as a certain MJ did) anywhere. They are & were always photographed. (with no scarfs over their faces)
Right--he's been very good about trying to raise normal, down-to-earth kids even though he's one of the most famous people on the planet.
-
So, as I looked for an image of this dress I love to the Heavens and back...I felt strange looking for clothes I admired on a woman. I don't know why, but I guess cause I have never been a fashion hound, and this is new for me. Yet I remembered this FAB dress Nancy wore to this event and I found it! It reminded me at the time of a pretty peacock look. That is a huge compliment as I love peacocks and it made me think of some type of Prussian Elegance vibe going on. And I liked her hair there as it is not all styled it looks natural and free. Gee, I am liking this huh? So here is my image of Mary, Paul and Nancy at the BAAFTA awards. LOVE THAT DRESS!
-
Triplets Love Paul:
Meant to add that the reason for the image removal was made clear within the post that contained the removed image. That post may be found here: http://maccaboard.paulmccartney.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=2607733#2607733
calicoskych2001:
A picture of Paul's youngest child has been removed for privacy reasons.
And I clearly didn't read it.
-
hey_kittay:
So, as I looked for an image of this dress I love to the Heavens and back...I felt strange looking for clothes I admired on a woman. I don't know why, but I guess cause I have never been a fashion hound, and this is new for me. Yet I remembered this FAB dress Nancy wore to this event and I found it! It reminded me at the time of a pretty peacock look. That is a huge compliment as I love peacocks and it made me think of some type of Prussian Elegance vibe going on. And I liked her hair there as it is not all styled it looks natural and free. Gee, I am liking this huh? So here is my image of Mary, Paul and Nancy at the BAAFTA awards. LOVE THAT DRESS!
Me too!!