The Paul McCartney Picture Thread
-
-
1972
-
Was this taken right before the Butcher cover? Love the look on his face!
-
Nancy R wrote:
Was this taken right before the Butcher cover? Love the look on his face!
With the dolls leg it looks like it. Plus Paul isn't going to give a big smile, what with his chipped tooth.
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Was this taken right before the Butcher cover? Love the look on his face!
With the dolls leg it looks like it. Plus Paul isn't going to give a big smile, what with his chipped tooth.
That’s right! Did you see this parody in the other thread?
-
-
Nancy R wrote:
Was this taken right before the Butcher cover? Love the look on his face!
Did the leg give it away? haha
-
Here’s one I had not seen before! (Forearm For Leslie)
-
More chipped tooth I just now found!
-
Nancy R wrote:
Here’s one I had not seen before! (Forearm For Leslie)
Oh my... *knuckles to mouth* I dare not say more...
-
Paul trying to be a rockette. 12-21-18
-
Nancy R wrote:
That’s right! Did you see this parody in the other thread?
No I didn't. Thanks for the link, the parody is really clever.
-
-
oobu24 wrote:
Paul trying to be a rockette. 12-21-18
Damn high kick for a 76 year old! Wrong leg though, Paulie!
-
Here’s one identified as April 1956 that I had never seen before! (Might be later - he looks older than almost 14!)
-
Nancy R wrote:
Here’s one identified as April 1956 that I had never seen before! (Might be later - he looks older than almost 14!)
Its a very odd looking photo with the subjects almost looking if they were pasted onto a photo of the building!! I certainly agree that Paul is looking older than 13. He looks more like 16 or 17...even 18 to me.
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Here’s one identified as April 1956 that I had never seen before! (Might be later - he looks older than almost 14!)
Its a very odd looking photo with the subjects almost looking if they were pasted onto a photo of the building!! I certainly agree that Paul is looking older than 13. He looks more like 16 or 17...even 18 to me.
He looks like he's about 16 to me too. Was wondering if that was Auntie Gin and her daughter (Paul's cousin) in the photo with him?
The photo looks to be post-1957 because of the Elvis hairstyle.... Elvis's first film, Jailhouse Rock, was released that year.
-
LadyLeslie wrote:
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Here’s one identified as April 1956 that I had never seen before! (Might be later - he looks older than almost 14!)
Its a very odd looking photo with the subjects almost looking if they were pasted onto a photo of the building!! I certainly agree that Paul is looking older than 13. He looks more like 16 or 17...even 18 to me.
He looks like he's about 16 to me too. Was wondering if that was Auntie Gin and her daughter (Paul's cousin) in the photo with him?
The photo looks to be post-1957 because of the Elvis hairstyle.... Elvis's first film, Jailhouse Rock, was released that year.
He looks about 16 or so to me, so if 1958, his Auntie Gin would be 48 years old. She had a son, Henry Ian, Born In 1938, so he’d be 20 then. I actually think the person on Paul’s left could be a young man. (Look at the jacket buttoned the men’s way) The person to his right is clearly a young woman, so not Gin.
-
Nancy R wrote:
He looks about 16 or so to me, so if 1958, his Auntie Gin would be 48 years old. She had a son, Henry Ian, Born In 1938, so he’d be 20 then. I actually think the person on Paul’s left could be a young man. (Look at the jacket buttoned the men’s way) The person to his right is clearly a young woman, so not Gin.
Yes, definately a female and two males and they all look to be of roughly the same age, 16 / 17. But the photo still doesn't look right to me, even to the point where Paul's head seems to have been pasted over someone elses. I still don't recall seeing that photo of Paul's face before though so its still new to me.
-
Kestrel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
He looks about 16 or so to me, so if 1958, his Auntie Gin would be 48 years old. She had a son, Henry Ian, Born In 1938, so he’d be 20 then. I actually think the person on Paul’s left could be a young man. (Look at the jacket buttoned the men’s way) The person to his right is clearly a young woman, so not Gin.
Yes, definately a female and two males and they all look to be of roughly the same age, 16 / 17. But the photo still doesn't look right to me, even to the point where Paul's head seems to have been pasted over someone elses. I still don't recall seeing that photo of Paul's face before though so its still new to me.
I suppose it could be a photoshop, but somehow I doubt it. I see nothing odd about the photo. ️