They are a brilliant band. I've got tickets for London next year. Expensive, but totally worth it!

Bring it back, as long as it's free for all.

audi:

jonh81:

audi:

He's had health problems in the recent past, but -- after seeing his embarrassing endorsement of Mitt Romney at that rally recently -- I think he may have other issues, as well. It's on YouTube, but -- as you are a devoted fan -- I would discourage you from watching it.

Wouldn't call myself a devoted fan, far from it ! didn't see the Mitt Romney clip, thought it was only Clint Eastwood doing a strange endorsement!

Well, in that case:

Thank you. That is one of the funniest things I have seen for a while!

I truly like it and think it is possibly his most underrated album by fans. It's most certainly a period piece, but the songs are terrific.

Very cool, you're an extremely talented guy. Nice attention to detail, lovely harmonies! Thanks for sharing your work with us.

You're very talented. Thank you for sharing your covers with us.

I certainly hope so, although I think that "landslide" may be a touch optimistic.

Where shall I leave David Cameron and Nick Clegg? Next to Mitt Romney?

Libertarianism is in interesting concept, but one which I feel is destined to fail. Social liberalism and fiscal conservatism are unlikely bedfellows. Those who are socially liberal tend to believe in taxation to help those less fortunate which naturally leads to a "bigger" Government. Those who are socially liberal tend to believe that the rights of the individual are secondary to the rights of the individual, for example gun control. Libertarians, from what I can gather, generally favour little gun control or Government interference. It doesn't help that those within the Libertarian movement cannot agree on the definition or parameters of Libertarianism. My personal feelings towards the movement is that it could potentially damage the very idea of society. Notions such as voluntarily funded Government, for example, would make it very difficult for social projects such as infrastructure initiatives or improvements to get off the ground and I can envisage such an attitude resulting in personal wealth governing individual freedoms if nearly everything is left to private or corporate funding, which is certainly less preferable to the society we live in today. It is too much like that as it is. If I am honest, I believe those people who subscribe to this movement need to think long and hard about long-term social consequences.

If Paul did a concert, as people are suggesting, for only Pioneer members (weren't there 1,000?), where could it be held that would be considered fair to all? The same question applies if it was opened up to all Premium members. Surely not enough opted for Premium membership to sell out a stadium... That, in my opinion, is why that idea appears to be a non-starter.