It's great to see that after all this time that Paul is every bit as good as good as ever and his fans are too.
Posts made by Mikemc
-
RE: Brooklyn, NY, Barclays Center, June 8th - ARCHIVE
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
For Edwards to be found guilty he has to have known he was breaking the law. But for the rest of us we were always told ignorance of the law is no excuse. He's gonna beat this whole thing by sticking to his story that he didn't know he was breaking the law. With all his money it would have been like pocket change to take care of his mistress with his money but he was too greedy and used other peoples money instead. He used the money from people who believed in him and donated to his campaign. He's the lowest of the low.
-
RE: ".Sunrise doesn't last all morning."BEATNUT
It's nightmares again for me. Last night and the night before I had nightmares involving Mike. In 1995 my best friend also died of cancer. He was 42 and left behind a lovely wife and two young children. I had trouble dealing with it for a long time. While I "snapped out of it" about eight months later I still had occasional nightmares about him for several years. Waking up in the middle of the night with cold sweats. It's happening again, only this time it's Mike I keep dreaming about. Maybe it's because he's on my mind constantly. But I can't and I don't want t0 stop thinking about him. He was a wonderful man who died way before his time and anyone who has ever met him knows what a great guy he was.
-
RE: ".Sunrise doesn't last all morning."BEATNUT
I'm still in shock over this tragedy. Mike might very well be the funniest person I've ever known in my life. The man had a heart of gold and would do anything for you. Friends don't get better than that. Right now I'm crying as I type this. He was way too young. He loved life and he loved being around people. If you were happy then he was happy. A bunch of us met in Manhattan in 2002 at a place called the Film Club Cafe @ 9th Ave & 45th St. It was all Mike's idea. We all talk on the board, how about doing a face to face. I remember driving home thinking omg, what a nice bunch of people. So nice, so decent-- all of them. I'm sure many, like myself, was a bit leery at first about meeting people "from the internet". I know I'm gonna forget some names but here's a list of whom I can think of that showed up that autumn Saturday: Lemmie, Clo, Rampaige RN, Keps, myself, Beatnut of course, and friends and spouses. I know I'm forgetting some names because my mind is still in a fog. Later on more of us would meet including Beatlemaniac, LCH, Daisy, Blondie10, Jude, and the three sisters, Denise, Sue and Kim. Denise and Kim just got home from a Liverpool tour only to hear this tragic news. Mike is gone but he will never be forgotten. He kept this board alive and laughing in the early days and if it weren't for him many of never would have met. Enjoy heaven, Mike, until we all meet again.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
You need to get over your obsession with Sarah Palin. You sound like you're going off the deep end.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
Sally You're quick to pass judgment on others, but the fact of the matter is that Obama's done nothing right since he became president. He made two overseas trips and came back empty handed. He has nothing tro show for those trips. The Russians made him look like an idiot. Which wasn't hard because that's what he is. Explain why we need another stimulus package when the first package has only placed about 10% into the economy. Why would any president put out another spending package when most of the first package hasn't been spent? Now Gibbs is backing off on Obama's promise not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year. I could have told you a year ago that obama would break that promise. Because it's impossible for him to do what he promises to do by just RAISING TAXES ON THE RICH. If he taxed then at 100% and seized all their assets and shot and killed them all it still wouldn't be enough for him to keep his campaign promises. But I don't blame all the Oboma lovers who see him as the second coming of Jesus Christ. I blame the dupes in the media who see him as the second coming of Jesus. btw, great posts Andy and Jaipur.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
peacetrain:
The_Fool:
(I am not a republican) .... What have the Democrat plans meant to me so far? Due to a direct hand of the Obama administration -- many in my company have been permanently laid off Most in the company are taking voluntary time off with no pay to HOPEfully try and keep our jobs. Neighbors are selling their houses and many small business places are getting rid of their workers or completely closing their business. All a direct hit by the Democrat party -- so forgive me if this hits close to home and I sound bitter -- then I hear of Global warming taxes and other bright ideas that are going to completely wipe out many more people and business places - sorry but there is no rah rah rah coming from me. I cannot even comprehend how some of these ideas happen -- it baffles me how someone can even think the way some in that party thinks. Can anyone explain to me why they want to destroy America?
So what's this you hear about the global warming tax and how it's going to "completely wipe out" so many people and businesses? How is this to happen? How much is this tax to be on the average taxpayer? (On a more historical note, have any of the sources of your information mentioned that environmental regulation in the past has only been a boon for industries, from the railroad to car industry? Have they also mentioned that the ONLY people coming up with these doomsday scenarios are from the handful of completely discredited "think tanks" funded heavily by the most powerful multi-billion dollar corporations?) I ask, because there is a lot if deliberate lying being put out by conservatives, the one that gained the most traction on the global warming tax being by the Heritage Foundation. Their numbers have been shown to be false - look at Fack Check, look at the GAO for crying out loud! You have to start zoning out the endless manipulation of the facts that come from those few think-tanks. Nobody, no scientist, no academic outside the echo chamber believes them.
I'm a Republican, but I don't know how much longer I will stay with them. They are the biggest bunch of wimps in U.S. history. I'll make my decision to stay or quit based on how they vote for the activist Supreme Court nominee Obama is gonna stick us with. She will get the job because the Dems have the majority, but I still want to see how they vote. Obama voted against Roberts. The Republicans should apply the same standards when they vote. Fact Check is bogus. It's part of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Obama worked for them with Bill Ayers and his beautiful bride, Bernardine Dohrn. It was the only executive job he held down in his life, until now. Envio laws are job killers. Their main objectives is too take our money. Obama admitted in 2008 that energy costs would skyrocket. He's singing a different song now because he's president. As he tries to turn the U.S. into a quasi-socialist society jobs are being lost. He told us TARP would keep unemployment below 8%. He got his TARP and now it's 9.5% and getting worse. Instead of halting it and trying to reverse the damage he want's to expand it. 9.5% unemployment in Europe is considered average.. In this country it's disastrous. If the energy bill just passed by Congress is such a jobs creator then why is there a provision to pay the salaries of millions of laid off people for three years? Obama has shown himself to be a liar. He promised that before he signed any bill he would post it on the White House website for five days. They now acknowledge that it's not gonna happen. The TARP Bill was put out in the middle of the night and no one, including Obama, who signed the bill, read it. Three hundred pages put in at the last minute and they wouldn't let the Republicans read it. The same thing with the Cap and Trade Fraud Bill. Three hundred additional pages stuffed in at 3 AM on the day it was passed. The Democrats are defrauding us all. If they had any credibility or were honest they wouldn't have sneak in billions of dollars of pork and the president would allow us to read the bill as promised. He's a bigger crook than Congress. It makes one long for the good old days of NIXON. There was an EPA study that took apart the claims made for the cap and trade Bill. That study was suppressed and the study was done by a 38 year veteran of the EPA and the author has been forbidden to speak out. So much for Obama's promise to be the most transparent administration in U.S. history. Obama didn't betray me because I could see right through his con when he ran for president. He betrayed every poor sucker who believed in him, campaigned for him, and/or voted for him.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
peacetrain:
mustangsally10:
Not too pleasant watching others play the same game you did is It? Wishful thinking on pro-life There has been 233 years of identity politics in supreme court choices...that's the point
Yes, but it's only acceptable when it privileges the status quo, you see! It's only when it's a woman that people start talking about gender and identity politics. When Bush picked men to replace the previous justices, no conservatives wondered if this were identity politics pandering to...gasp...men! Such blatant inconsistency should just be laughed at!
No, they were just personally attacked. The Dems started that with Robert Bork, then got racist about Clarence Thomas. How dare a black man be a conservative. Thomas described it as a high tech lynching. When Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated by Clinton she sailed right through. The Republicans should have used Barack Obama's own standards and not voted for her. Prior to the Supreme Court she held a high level position with the ACLU which is a good indication that she would advocate from the bench. And that's exactly what she does. Sum up a Supreme Court case in three pages and I'll tell you how RBG is gonna vote. Regarding Obama's nomination, it's the Democrats who've been making a big deal over her ethnicity and gender. But they are so condescending about it too. It's supposed to be a miracle that a Puerto Rican can achieve such academic success. People succeed everyday and for the Democrats to be making such an issue because a Puerto Rican succeeded tells me they believe that Puerto Ricans are inferior and we all must celebrate the only one with brains.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
Andy_Shofar:
Let's see Photo-op Air Force One NYC White House President Obama A 'Classified' Photo Op Turns Into a Soaring Blunder for the White House Mission to Get Beauty Shots of Presidential Jet at Statue of Liberty Panics 9/11-Wary New York April 27, 2009 By SUZANNE SATALINE, JONATHAN D. ROCKOFF & CHRISTOPHER CONKEY As secret missions go, this one was a flop. On Monday morning, one of the 747s used to ferry around the president of the U.S. was dispatched to the Statue of Liberty, escorted by fighter jets. Assignment: Get some fresh glamour shots of the plane. The Air Force said the flight needed to remain confidential. So while New York police knew about it, as did at least one person in the mayor's office, regular New Yorkers remained in the dark. PANIC http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090427/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_low_flying_plane_purpose Raw: Startled New Yorkers Run Through Streets as Obama Plane Photo Op Goes Awry http://www.breitbart.tv/html/327763.html And this marks the close of day 98 when Obama's White House scares the s**t out of many thousands of New Yorkers & Jersey City folk all for a photo-op!
Barack Obama is the dumbest piece of shit to ever become president. This guy and his entire administration are so fucken stupid. Flying a low altitude 747 over lower Manhattan with 2 jet fighters escorting it for a "photo op" has to be the dumbest move by a president in over 200 years. Did you hear the people in Battery Park screaming while they were running? What if someone had a heart attack and died while they were running? What would that imbecile occupying the White House say? Oh, but we had to take pictures so I could show off. What a dickhead. While this is happening Moron Obama is reading another speech someone wrote for him and his teleprompter died. He stood there like a deer in the headlights. he was stuttering and stammering while the AUDIENCE LAUGHED AT HIM. I wonder how much fuel the Air Force One plane and the two fighter jets burned up so they could take pictures? Where are the envio kooks now? This guy is a total moron. On Earth Day he flew over 900 miles on Air Force One to read a short speech his staff wrote about energy conservation. I read that over 9,000 gallons of fuel, at minimum were used. That's not counting Marine One or his limo and the dozens of vehicles in his entourage. When he flies it require two 747's and at least two fighter jets. I can't remember anything by a president that's as dumb as this idiotic move. Now I know why he will not allow his transcripts to be released from Columbia and Harvard.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
Rocío Record:
We are concern about the swine flu, schools will be till next May 6th, a person died because she was visiting Mexico City on Easter and 10 people have the virus in the state of Nuevo Leon...
Hi Rocio, I hope all goes well at home. And I hope they keep the schools closed as long as necessary. Something this bad happens once in a generation. Good luck and hang in there.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
21st Century Paul:
Well, as usual with bad news, media is doing a stretch on the Mexico flu thing. Here, there seems to be 10 infected people. "All of them have improved". you don't improve in 24 hours not even of an ordinary flu.... So nothing serious here...
Ten infected people can mean 1,000 may be carrying the virus at this moment which could mean 10,000 in another few weeks. You're in Europe, hopefully you'll be spared from the worst of it. But no matter what you can't blame the media for stretching this story. Anything in North America can spread to Europe real fast these days.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
jaipur:
mustagtsally posted in her wikipedia disseration: Article 4 defines prisoners of war to include: 4.1.1 Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict and members of militias of such armed forces 4.1.2 Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, provided that they fulfill all of the following conditions: that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates; that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance (there are limited exceptions to this among countries who observe the 1977 Protocol I); that of carrying arms openly; that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of warang The agreement needs to be viewed in toto (look up the legal term up if you need to), and is not simply applied to the selective points that you like. Note the items I placed in bold: al qaeda does not fulfill 4.1.2 (b). Therefore, unless you are able to apply the agreement in toto, your point is moot. Selectivity is not applicable. What is good for one, is good for everyone. And do save some space for the rest of us and not post the supreme court's review of the combatants...we are all aware of their ruling. You, yourself , no doubt, have rejected the supreme court's rulings, particular on the 2000 US election. When Vietnam, a signatory to the Geneva Convention in 1957 was torturing John McCain in 1968, where were you and everyone else?? The U.S.S Pueblo?? Lloyd Bucher, the captain, died in 2004 from the injuries he obtained as a prisoner of war of North Korea. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), signed the Geneva Convention in 1957. Is it that Vietnam and North Korea can torture Americans, yet what was done in Guantanamo only receives your moral indignation??. Your case is quite weak in that regard.
People on the far left don't care about Americans tortured in Vietnam, North Korea, or anywhere else in the world. I just watched a 2 hour special on Guantanamo bay. Then another one followed showing a Mexican jail. OMG. They are forced to live with violence, hunger filth, and rape. Where's MS10 regarding that rat infested prison? The Taliban and al Qaeda never signed onto the Geneva Conventions.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
Mikemc:
www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html
Oliver, It's a nice try with the lie liar lying game, but it's getting old. And you're only using it avoid substance. How about responding to this NY Times article from 1999 proving that Bill Clinton and the Democrats were solely the ones to blame by forcing banks to give mortgages to people who could not possibly afford to make their payments. They, especially Bill Clinton, caused the mortgage crisis. Lost in all this mess created by the Democrats is that families who were renting and got pushed into homes by "compassionate" liberals and community organizers. None of them care that such families who were doing fine when they were left alone lost their houses, their credit rating, and as such had the quality of their lives wrecked. It's not important what happens to those blacks, hispanics, and a handful of token whites. We never hear about them. All that matters is that white liberals feel good about themselves while making sure none of those people are gonna be living in their neighborhoods. Not all of the blame goes to white liberals. let's not forget black liberal politicians and community organizers who sold out their own people for a quick buck. I hope you, steven, and ms10 read that article. I know none of you will comment on that article. On my previous post Stephen extracted a small part of one sentence. That's real class. Extract part of a sentence and put it in quotes. If Clinton, Obama and others like them were pedophiles you people would say the child was asking for it.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
Thanks Jaipur. You should see the stuff that the three of them have been hurling at me over the past couple of pages. It's because they make up stuff they can't back up, like the cut and paste job of the Geneva Convention from Wikipedia, of all places. It would be like me saying Obama said that he's too dumb to lead our country. Then of course if said Obama said that they would challenge it, as well they should. Then I post a link to a 700 page online book and say "it's in there, go check it out".
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
21st Century Paul:
Mikemc:
Thank you Oliver. I'm glad your only gonna watch my posts in the future. If you went back several pages the whole internet would come crashing down. All you includes you. You called me liar several times but never backed it up. But I understand your only talking about future posts because I don't want you to destroy Al Gore's invention. A few posts back you posted to me No, the internet would not crash down, another lie? I've not called you a liar not even once. So another lie here... It's not an Al Gore's invention, another lie?
21st Century Paul:
Yet another lie. We don't need to that. You asked to point lies in your posts. It's not gonna be hard...
You don't say I'm a liar you just keep saying I post lies, it's the same thing, and you can't even point out any lies. Your looking towards the future because there are way too many in the past to show us. Yea, right. Because you know there not here. You know it and I know and so does everyone else. And that includes the left wing loons who can only call me names.
No saying you post lies it's not the same as saying you're a liar. Out of this board you can be very true, I don't know. Or in other threads, or in this one in the past... I just point exact moments. If you are so interested maybe I'll do the thing of going back to find lies... All I know is that recently you have posted a lot. Yet, I don't say you're liar. As if I posted a lie that wouldn't make me a liar, being a liar is a "constant personality trait". And a lie is a single fact in time. As someone fooled is not a fool because of that. Personality trait vs fact.
If someone says something that is incorrect, that person is wrong or incorrect. Either word is accurate. If someone says something he or she knows is false that person is a liar because he or she knowingly said something that's a lie. Using your analogy is like saying after Saddam Hussein killed hundreds of thousand of people with poison gas. -- "I'm not saying he committed genocide I'm just saying he gassed hundreds of thousands of innocent women, men, and children". The Al Gore remark is a joke and you know it. Some years back he made a flippant remark about being involved in the infancy of the internet and lots of people laught AT him. Just as they did when he said he was the inspiration for the Ryan O'Neil character in the movie "Love Story". I haven't posted any lies on here. You can't find any lies. But your political beliefs are so far left that you can say with a straight face that you wouldn't want Osama bin Laden as a leader. If you weren't so far left you wouldn't even have to say that. If you post a single lie, you lied. if you habitually lie, then you're a liar and you keep saying I'm telling lies. Using your own analogy, that is calling me a liar. You can't post a single thing that I said that's a lie. Yet, you keep saying i lied. Go back all you want, you won't find a single lie. If I made a post in July and said I was at the beach and I was freezing that would be something you would use to say I told a lie because the temperature is not below freezing in July. The fact that you reposted my Al Gore joke in red as proof shows how little you got. Now go ahead, I dare you. Go back and dig away and show me, better yet, show everybody my lies. Just don't take my posts out of context by pulling one sentence out of three paragraphs. Don't deceive people.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
SurSteven:
Mikemc:
I am glad the Democrats are in charge
Me too!
Somebody help me, please.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
Mikemc:
Obama was taken aback when he realized he was more of a socialist than Western Europe leaders. Who would be the dictator in your one world socialist utopia? Osama bin Laden : :
21st Century Paul:
Well, my utopia, yes it's a utopia, right now. "Imagine there's no countries..." Yet another lie. Where have I stated there will a Dictator or so... or that it will socialist?. Of course it would not be Osama Bin Laden. Of course it would not be a dictator. IT would be the democracy you and I know, someone like George W. Bush could win, for instance, not that I want that but it would be not a different system that the national ones. And it would be socialist if majority of the world wanted that or whatever other ideology. Of course this is not gonna happen in any predictable future (mostly cause all of the nations (or regions) insist in make his people feel different from other nations, feel "American", "Spanish" or whatever, when we're all the same and flags and those things are just things to keep us apart and to fight... in the meantime, nations with "strange" taxes and others laws will exist... Thank God we have music, for instance to reminds us we're all the same. The Beatles, you like, I like it (like the Req Square documental says...), he in the other side of the world likes it... It doesn't matter where the Beatles come from and where you listen... we're all people.
I didn't say you stated a dictator. So I didn't lie and you know. As John Lennon would say: Now junior behave yourself. One world gov would never happen because a Bush or an Obama would be totally different and people like that can only get elected back to back in a democratic republic.. A constitution would have be drawn up, even though the one here has been misinterpreted by activist judges for way too long. With socialism no one has any reason to want to excel at anything. Why bust your butt all your life while your neighbor sho is useless and lazy lives as good as you? As far as a democracy like you and I know I believe we know different democracies. We have two powerful party's and the rest are minor and not capable of fielding a third party candidate. I agree about the Beatles and Red Square. But I have a problem with Red Square. was at my brother's house last week and had a copy and I took it home. The sound quality compared to other concert dvd's I've heard is second rate. It's interesting, very informative, but not as entertaining as I would have expected.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
21st Century Paul:
Mikemc:
21st Century Paul:
Mikemc:
21st Century Paul:
Mikemc:
21st Century Paul:
SusyLuvsPaul:
When I see that Blue Meanie pic or MikeMc. post then I know not to believe them whole hog or even half way, it's not gonna be unbiased and objective.
I don't mind if it biased or objective... everyone's defends their point of view. But once there's lies... there's nothing I can discuss. If someone is talking about reality but twisting it till it becomes a lie... what the use of discussing that?
But there are no lies coming from me. Out of nowhere, suzylovespaul, chimed in calling me a liar. I eagerly await here reply for proof, but I don't expect that to happen.
Well, you're just lying Mike... Susy has said your posts "are not unbiased and objective" and that doesn't mean you're lying. You can be subjective and biased and not lie, you're not gonna be close to reality but you're not lying really.
Oliver, you should have compared notes with M Sally before you said that. You see she chimed in and said Suzylovespaul was referring to the same lies I told you and and her regarding income taxes paid by the rich. What the you, Msally, and suzy need to do is communicate back and forth amongst yourselves using pm's and decide which two of you are gonna throw the other one under the bus. UPDATE I couldnt delete this post, so never mind. SLP already threw herself under.
Yet another lie. We don't need to that. You asked to point lies in your posts. It's not gonna be hard...
Well what's taking you and all the others so long. C'mon, Ive been waiting for days. Instead all you people do is personally attack. That's all the far left can ever do. Just look at what the low life losers post over at hate groups like the Huffington Post and the Daily Kos. Being that you jumped in why don't you show me the slurs I said about Obama on election night this past November. That would be one good way you can prove I'm liar because I didn't make any slurs. What kind of slurs did I make, racial?
I just said I would point your lies in your future posts. I'm not that sick to get back dozens of pages and search for lies, thank you. Another lie, from just the post above: "Instead all you people do is personally attack"All of you includes me, and I'm not attacking personally anyone... well maybe Bush sometimes, but not you or other boardies. There's a huge difference in pointing lies and for instance, call someone "A liar", a thing I haven't done. I'm not far left... that would me put into communism and I'm not that at all... I don't know if you included me in that...
Being that you jumped in why don't you show me the slurs I said about Obama on election night this past November. That would be one good way you can prove I'm liar because I didn't make any slurs. What kind of slurs did I make, racial?
Because I don't want to lose time getting back and reading that posts... it's quite easier to read the present ones. And I don't say you're a liar. I just point out when you say a lie, ask you request!.
Thank you Oliver. I'm glad your only gonna watch my posts in the future. If you went back several pages the whole internet would come crashing down. All you includes you. You called me liar several times but never backed it up. But I understand your only talking about future posts because I don't want you to destroy Al Gore's invention. A few posts back you posted to me
21st Century Paul:
Yet another lie. We don't need to that. You asked to point lies in your posts. It's not gonna be hard...
You don't say I'm a liar you just keep saying I post lies, it's the same thing, and you can't even point out any lies. Your looking towards the future because there are way too many in the past to show us. Yea, right. Because you know there not here. You know it and I know and so does everyone else. And that includes the left wing loons who can only call me names.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
SurSteven:
Mikemc:
Who would be the dictator in your one world socialist utopia? Osama bin Laden : :
You've just proven by this statement how clueless you are on the issues. You're obviously a Natzi and KKK wannabe and probably daydream of being married to Rush Limbaugh where you n "Raj" could own all the money in the world and make slaves of all of us? Personally...I'll take Obama...and Democratic Democracy! Thank God you neocon nitties are out of office!
It's barely past sundown and the rats are already climbing out of the sewer. Steven, look how pathetic you look. First of all, you snip one sentence of my post because taking my words out of context is the only way you can push your foul agenda. Your agenda is so wrong that you can't even make your points with the truth. I can. ou have no integrity whatsoever and you have no shame either. Your personal attacks reflect on you, not me. You get so enraged that you reduce yourself to hurling personal insults at me and your eyes were probably bulging while your blood pressure was going through the roof as you slammed away of your keyboard. I hope you didn't break any fingers as you slammed the words NATZI and KKK. You just showed us all how your brilliant mind works. KKK Nazi. Yea right, get a life, get a brain. Speaking of brain, I hope you don't have a aneurysm when you read this article from the Holy Bible of Liberalism. It's about Clinton and how it was actions that took place because of him that caused the mortgage crisis we are in today that nearly collapsed the economy. Lucky for him it was only Iceland that collapsed. Anyway, in case you might have memory loss from the pressure on your brain Clinton is the one. the one you were thinking of when you wished it could have been you instead of Monica. Read it and weep. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html I am glad that the radical leftists are back in charge. Because, like 9/11, Americans have such a short memory. Now they will see once again just how fucked up things get when the Democrats are in charge. A lot of people that I know who voted for Obama did so because they hated Bush's guts. They are now learning how dumb it is to vote for one person because you hate somebody else. That's why they were able to put out a candidate who never held down a real job in his entire life. Not one person at Columbia University who attended classes with Obama remembers him. His roommate was tracked down by the media and when he refused to talk they immediately left. He was then made made president of the Harvard Law Review without having ever published anything. He was a first at two things. he was the first black person made president of the HLR and he was the first person made president of the HLR without ever having written anything. I am glad the Democrats are in charge because as that 1999 article from the liberal bible shows Americans really do have a short memory.
-
RE: The ..2012.... Political thread
BandontheRun:
mustangsally10:
President Obamas' message to the Iranians....about time the US has a real leader
thumbs up for intelligence and leadershipObama - Iran is laughing at you..
So is North Korea and China.