GQ Magazine: His Most Candid Interview Yet
-
Nancy R wrote:
Kestrel wrote:
LadyLeslie wrote:
But the fact that Paul doesn't like facebook and isn't involved alot in social media on a daily basis isn't surprising, especially for someone who is very private and doesn't like to share minute details about himself.
I think its an age thing as well. Most people who are pushing 80 aren't interested in the internet. Paul obvously uses email (there's enoughevidence to support that) and he no doubt uses video calling/zoom etc for keeping in visual contact. But I can't imagine Paul having any interest in wasting his time visiting messages boards and social media sites about himself. As he says, he has his team in place to do that. But i still find it amusing the amount of fans who still think he does read their posts, and then bail out (there are plenty of people on these boards who have done so over the years) once reality kicks in and they realise that they won't be going on Paul's Christmas Card list, simply becasue they have created thousands of posts saying squiffy things about him.
"squiffy"
Is that what Leslie & I do?
I think so... especially when it involves Paul's facial hair
We aren't trying to get on his Christmas card list though
-
LadyLeslie wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Kestrel wrote:
LadyLeslie wrote:
But the fact that Paul doesn't like facebook and isn't involved alot in social media on a daily basis isn't surprising, especially for someone who is very private and doesn't like to share minute details about himself.
I think its an age thing as well. Most people who are pushing 80 aren't interested in the internet. Paul obvously uses email (there's enoughevidence to support that) and he no doubt uses video calling/zoom etc for keeping in visual contact. But I can't imagine Paul having any interest in wasting his time visiting messages boards and social media sites about himself. As he says, he has his team in place to do that. But i still find it amusing the amount of fans who still think he does read their posts, and then bail out (there are plenty of people on these boards who have done so over the years) once reality kicks in and they realise that they won't be going on Paul's Christmas Card list, simply becasue they have created thousands of posts saying squiffy things about him.
"squiffy"
Is that what Leslie & I do?
I think so... especially when it involves Paul's facial hair
We aren't trying to get on his Christmas card list though
I think we're on his "naughty" list though!
-
Nancy R wrote:
LadyLeslie wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
Kestrel wrote:
LadyLeslie wrote:
But the fact that Paul doesn't like facebook and isn't involved alot in social media on a daily basis isn't surprising, especially for someone who is very private and doesn't like to share minute details about himself.
I think its an age thing as well. Most people who are pushing 80 aren't interested in the internet. Paul obvously uses email (there's enoughevidence to support that) and he no doubt uses video calling/zoom etc for keeping in visual contact. But I can't imagine Paul having any interest in wasting his time visiting messages boards and social media sites about himself. As he says, he has his team in place to do that. But i still find it amusing the amount of fans who still think he does read their posts, and then bail out (there are plenty of people on these boards who have done so over the years) once reality kicks in and they realise that they won't be going on Paul's Christmas Card list, simply becasue they have created thousands of posts saying squiffy things about him.
"squiffy"
Is that what Leslie & I do?
I think so... especially when it involves Paul's facial hair
We aren't trying to get on his Christmas card list though
I think we're on his "naughty" list though!
I wasn't expecting any presents this year anyway!
-
SusyLuvsPaul wrote:
Yankeefan2 wrote:
SusyLuvsPaul wrote:
Wings was mentioned once in this article.
Paul might have looked in here now and then, probably still does at times, because it's his official website. He may have got on the puter more often during lockdown. A bit more often. This message board did seem more interesting when a lot more people were participating and posting.
What I took away from this piece is that he's writing songs, and not only for the musical ! He sounds like he's pretty deep into his songwriting !
Suzy, I will just say for me there is really not much to post about anymore on this site. I know I have beaten a few subjects to death on this board (Setlist, Solo career recognition etc) and to continue to post about it will not change a thing. I really have little desire to post or read about his Beatle career, been there done that -lol. The few times I will post will be if there is a thread about something current like Ringo's 80th birthday or this recent GQ article. Finally, without a McCartney tour, new record or some other news IMO this board will have limited activity.
Oh--I wrote my last post on this thread before I saw this. Yeah, it makes sense when there's new stuff going on these forums will stir up more enthusiasm and interest. He does have news from him fairly often. I can go without a lot of news knowing he's holed up in his posh digs there writing new songs presently. His gift hasn't deserted him, he hasn't dried up song writing wise like Billy Joel for example says he has. Weren't you stoked when he dropped several hints in this article that he's writing new songs?
Yes, I am thrilled he is still writing music and he has been amazing the last 25 years. I was over him touring for years and I really looked forward to each new album. It looks like we will get at least one more album from him and then we will hopefully get to hear his music for "It's A Wonderful Life". IMO McCartney does not get the credit he truly deserves for being such a prolific songwriter into his late 70's. As much as I liked Billy Joel, that was very disappointing when he said basically he was dead creatively.
-
B.B. King and Leonard Cohen, to name just two, each came out with several highly lauded albums in their early and mid 80's. Their talents had only grown after being practiced and honed for many decades, and they had developed in insight and wisdom. While still retaining a great deal of their youthfulness. They went out on the road touring behind those minor masterpieces. In support of their late in life hit albums.( B.B. sat down while performing, but he was still up there on stage. ) I think Dylan and Paul Mc., among others, will follow suit. Also, don't forget one's chronological age can differ greatly from how old one is in one's mind. You can go right on feeling and thinking, or thinking, at least, like you're still age 28 or so, in your mind. (While not being up on and hip to the latest millenial slang and fads, of course.) Macca's in good shape physically (as well as mentally) since he's been a veggie all these years, and he rides bikes, etc. Works out in gyms and does yoga. He's stated he's laid off the sauce, ciggies and other chemical drugs, even organic marijuana, for a long time, now. He said he wanted to be a good example to his grandkids. I feel optimistic we'll still have him around in the future.
-
jimmix wrote:
Sir Paul McCartney’s greatest ever songs, as chosen by GQ
This didn't come up, was it with the article?
First I'd like to say that Mary's photos were wonderful. Next to Linda, her photos of Paul always bring out the best of Paul. I really enjoyed all the photos and getting a peek at Paul's place. It's as just as nice as you knew it would be. And to round out the family, there he was in Stella's clothes... the family Range Rover.
A great interview too! Really enjoyed it and not the usual questions we all know... instead some decent and interesting questions. Well done piece!
-
SusyLuvsPaul wrote:
B.B. King and Leonard Cohen, to name just two, each came out with several highly lauded albums in their early and mid 80's. Their talents had only grown after being practiced and honed for many decades, and they had developed in insight and wisdom. While still retaining a great deal of their youthfulness. They went out on the road touring behind those minor masterpieces. In support of their late in life hit albums.( B.B. sat down while performing, but he was still up there on stage. )
Cohen did not tour in his 80s. He stopped touring for good shortly after his 79th birthday in 2013.
-
This photo was taken the same day as the backwards one with the Gibson Les Paul that I was talking about.
-
Keith Richards' Beatles Observation That Put The Band Into Perspective
-
love2travel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
This photo was taken the same day as the backwards one with the Gibson Les Paul that I was talking about.
What was the photo you were talking about? I didn't see all the photos you were mentioning. One in a garden that I didn' t see either. Is there a thread where all the photos from that photo shoot were posted?
You have to scroll back and read this thread. Jimmix posted a link where there was a pic of Paul laying across a bench with his Gibson Les Paul, but it was printed backwards. The article and photo can no longer be accessed for some reason. The photo (and the one I posted) are old and have nothing to do with the current GQ photoshoot.
-
If anyone outside the U.K. wants to buy this magazine, you can get it through yourcelebritymagazines.com. I've purchased from them before.
-
Paul McCartney’s Gratitude
The world’s leading rock star breaks the mold by counting his blessings.
-
Paul McCartney: Social Media Puts Pressure On People
-
jimmix wrote:
Paul McCartney: Social Media Puts Pressure On People
Nice to read that Paul thinks that someone dying is important.
Its probably quite important to them as well !!
-
jimmix wrote:
Paul McCartney’s Gratitude
The world’s leading rock star breaks the mold by counting his blessings.
That was a touching story. So nice to read about positive upbeat attitudes such as gratitude and blessings and a great outlook on life.
-
Nancy R wrote:
love2travel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
This photo was taken the same day as the backwards one with the Gibson Les Paul that I was talking about.
What was the photo you were talking about? I didn't see all the photos you were mentioning. One in a garden that I didn' t see either. Is there a thread where all the photos from that photo shoot were posted?
You have to scroll back and read this thread. Jimmix posted a link where there was a pic of Paul laying across a bench with his Gibson Les Paul, but it was printed backwards. The article and photo can no longer be accessed for some reason. The photo (and the one I posted) are old and have nothing to do with the current GQ photoshoot.
This is the photo, correctly configurated. It was posted backwards on FB and I flipped it. The year given was 1987 - is that right?
-
This was taken the same day:
-
Nancy R wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
love2travel wrote:
Nancy R wrote:
This photo was taken the same day as the backwards one with the Gibson Les Paul that I was talking about.
What was the photo you were talking about? I didn't see all the photos you were mentioning. One in a garden that I didn' t see either. Is there a thread where all the photos from that photo shoot were posted?
You have to scroll back and read this thread. Jimmix posted a link where there was a pic of Paul laying across a bench with his Gibson Les Paul, but it was printed backwards. The article and photo can no longer be accessed for some reason. The photo (and the one I posted) are old and have nothing to do with the current GQ photoshoot.
This is the photo, correctly configurated. It was posted backwards on FB and I flipped it. The year given was 1987 - is that right?
Thanks so much NancyR, for flipping that photo! That was 1987? He has truly found the fountain of youth! This is a really nice photo very GQ!
-
I don't know if it is 1987 or not, that's why I asked. The FB poster labeled it 1987. (but also posted it backwards so I wasn't too keen to trust them on the date!)
-
Nancy R wrote:
I don't know if it is 1987 or not, that's why I asked. The FB poster labeled it 1987. (but also posted it backwards so I wasn't too keen to trust them on the date!)
As these photos have recently been used to illustrate articles on the Flaming Pie album, I had assumed they would have been closer to 1997 than 1987?