New in the Charts Thread
-
Don't understand a lot of the fuss about new chart position for the UK it reached a higher position than: WILD LIFE RED ROSE LONDON TOWN BACK TO THE EGG PIPES OF PEACE PRESS TO PLAY CHOBA OFF THE GROUND RUN DEVIL RUN DRIVING RAIN CHAOS MEMORY ALMOST And there's some great music in those albums above! need I say more...
-
Suzy & The Red Stripe:
Don't understand a lot of the fuss about new chart position for the UK it reached a higher position than: WILD LIFE RED ROSE LONDON TOWN BACK TO THE EGG PIPES OF PEACE PRESS TO PLAY CHOBA OFF THE GROUND RUN DEVIL RUN DRIVING RAIN CHAOS MEMORY ALMOST And there's some great music in those albums above! need I say more...
The fuss is about NEW probably vanishing from the UK Charts after only 4 weeks! The list doesn`t really mean that much since e.g. London Town was No. 24 on the year-end chart for 1978 !! Also note that Bowie`s last album rocketed up again to the Top 30 this week and Elton for 2 weeks now reversed the downward slide in the UK. Both way ahead of NEW now. Given the amount of promotion and the quality of the album this is mind-boggling.
-
Sadly New only sold 49.000 on the global chart last week slipping from #6 to #13 on that chart . The album is very good so just what has happened to Paul's once wide fan base that he can no longer compete with the likes of Elton , Bowie and Rod . Was it a mistake to leave EMI ?
-
Sir Guy Grand:
Sadly New only sold 49.000 on the global chart last week slipping from #6 to #13 on that chart . The album is very good so just what has happened to Paul's once wide fan base that he can no longer compete with the likes of Elton , Bowie and Rod . Was it a mistake to leave EMI ?
Huh? In the U.S. "New" has massively outsold Elton's last album, which is at #75 in just its 4th week.
-
With poor performance of New in UK charts (75) so far compared to US , although US could be better (17 on Billboard). I wonder why Paul's UK fan base or just the general public have lost interest. I often wonder is it the " tall poppy" syndrome. I am sure any objective listener would agree New is a excellent album as most critics have said. So it must be something else working against it. What do you Brits think ???
-
toris:
audi:
So, is Norway the only country where NEW hit No. 1?
Gawd, that reminds me of the Imagine doco (and I'm going on memory, so could be wrong - too hard to research 'cos then I'd have to pull out the DVD, change my TV setting, fast forward, listen to Yoko giving "expert" advice on production and instrumentation, etc), but I recall John and George having a discussion about the Beatles as solo artists.... "Beatle Ed is doing big in Sweden." (close enough to Norway) Now, I always thought they were having a dig at Paul.... Could've been Ringo? Or was John referring to himself in his magnificent self-deprecating style? Or am I completely travelling the wrong way down a one-way street? At any rate, it just reminded me of that. I still think #3 is a very good result. And NEW is a winner.
All things considered, I agree.
-
Nancy R:
audi:
So, is Norway the only country where NEW hit No. 1?
Does that mean you have Norwegian wood Audi?
Hardy-har-harrrrr.
-
Apollo C. Vermouth:
With poor performance of New in UK charts (75) so far compared to US , although US could be better (17 on Billboard). I wonder why Paul's UK fan base or just the general public have lost interest. I often wonder is it the " tall poppy" syndrome. I am sure any objective listener would agree New is a excellent album as most critics have said. So it must be something else working against it. What do you Brits think ???
Very, very few artists are moving units of new product these days. I would say that there are less than 20 pop/rock acts selling in the millions these days. As much as country-music still sells, I was quite shocked that Scott McCreery's new album seems to have tanked. Incidentally, nearly every male that has ever won American Idol no longer has a record-deal.
-
audi:
Apollo C. Vermouth:
With poor performance of New in UK charts (75) so far compared to US , although US could be better (17 on Billboard). I wonder why Paul's UK fan base or just the general public have lost interest. I often wonder is it the " tall poppy" syndrome. I am sure any objective listener would agree New is a excellent album as most critics have said. So it must be something else working against it. What do you Brits think ???
Very, very few artists are moving units of new product these days. I would say that there are less than 20 pop/rock acts selling in the millions these days. As much as country-music still sells, I was quite shocked that Scott McCreery's new album seems to have tanked.
You are correct. And I think this is a new era in music. Technology and the internet have made the "sale" of music a moot point. Also, the way "artists" get famous and successful is horrible. There is no more working your way to the top. Now, parents have their kids singing at age five, have a manager by age ten. a recording and tv deal by age 14, a world tour by age 18 and then a sex tape by age 21. Oh, and being able to sing and play an instrument, or write songs, not really all that important anymore. And having natural talent and charisma? Not needed. Paul McCartney, and other artists like Billy Joel, Elton John, The Rolling Stones, The Who, and later acts like Cheap Trick and Aerosmith, remind us there was a time when all that mattered.
-
RMartinez:
audi:
Apollo C. Vermouth:
With poor performance of New in UK charts (75) so far compared to US , although US could be better (17 on Billboard). I wonder why Paul's UK fan base or just the general public have lost interest. I often wonder is it the " tall poppy" syndrome. I am sure any objective listener would agree New is a excellent album as most critics have said. So it must be something else working against it. What do you Brits think ???
Very, very few artists are moving units of new product these days. I would say that there are less than 20 pop/rock acts selling in the millions these days. As much as country-music still sells, I was quite shocked that Scott McCreery's new album seems to have tanked.
You are correct. And I think this is a new era in music. Technology and the internet have made the "sale" of music a moot point. Also, the way "artists" get famous and successful is horrible. There is no more working your way to the top. Now, parents have their kids singing at age five, have a manager by age ten. a recording and tv deal by age 14, a world tour by age 18 and then a sex tape by age 21. Oh, and being able to sing and play an instrument, or write songs, not really all that important anymore. And having natural talent and charisma? Not needed. Paul McCartney, and other artists like Billy Joel, Elton John, The Rolling Stones, The Who, and later acts like Cheap Trick and Aerosmith, remind us there was a time when all that mattered.
-
Found an old clip from the American, syndicated t.v.-series America's Top 40 (November 23, 1983). Guess who's at #2:
-
audi:
Apollo C. Vermouth:
With poor performance of New in UK charts (75) so far compared to US , although US could be better (17 on Billboard). I wonder why Paul's UK fan base or just the general public have lost interest. I often wonder is it the " tall poppy" syndrome. I am sure any objective listener would agree New is a excellent album as most critics have said. So it must be something else working against it. What do you Brits think ???
Very, very few artists are moving units of new product these days. I would say that there are less than 20 pop/rock acts selling in the millions these days. As much as country-music still sells, I was quite shocked that Scott McCreery's new album seems to have tanked. Incidentally, nearly every male that has ever won American Idol no longer has a record-deal.
"Incidentally, nearly every male that has ever won American Idol no longer has a record-deal" Because some of them should have not won, like Taylor Hicks who beat the definitely more talented Katherine McPhee.
-
Sir Guy Grand:
NEW drops from #41 to # 75 on the UK album chart , that's a 4 week chart run , it could fallout of the top 100 next week .
Although I've only counted them the once (so I might be out by one or two), there are 44 albums above 'New' ( at # 75) in the UK album chart which have been in the Top 100 chart for longer. That further highlights just how much 'New' has under performed. http://www.officialcharts.com/albums-chart/ .
-
NEW in Japan I just read that NEW hit #2 in Japan. What's even more impressive is that it also said that Macca is the first artist over 70 in Japan to have cracked the Top 10. I'm not sure if they are referring to "foreign" artist only. I would think that a Japanese artist over 70 has cracked the TOP 10. Regardless, this is one heck of a feat by our favorite guy!!! ______________________________________________ As a side note, I am still amazed after regularly reading the comments' section from any one of Britain's major news companies on anything about Paul, how much hatred there is for Macca over there. The personal attacks blow my mind. You would think that they would be proud of one of their own making such a worldwide contribution These haters won't even admit that NEW is even a fairly good CD. Living in the US, I have personally met a good number of people who don't like Paul's music or have succumbed to the usual media bias about Paul, but I can't recall any of them with this level of hatred and animosity about Macca.
-
B J Conlee:
NEW in Japan I just read that NEW hit #2 in Japan. What's even more impressive is that it also said that Macca is the first artist over 70 in Japan to have cracked the Top 10. I'm not sure if they are referring to "foreign" artist only. I would think that a Japanese artist over 70 has cracked the TOP 10. Regardless, this is one heck of a feat by our favorite guy!!! ______________________________________________ As a side note, I am still amazed after regularly reading the comments' section from any one of Britain's major news companies on anything about Paul, how much hatred there is for Macca over there. The personal attacks blow my mind. You would think that they would be proud of one of their own making such a worldwide contribution These haters won't even admit that NEW is even a fairly good CD. Living in the US, I have personally met a good number of people who don't like Paul's music or have succumbed to the usual media bias about Paul, but I can't recall any of them with this level of hatred and animosity about Macca.
Japan is going wild for Paul! It's fun to read about and see all the NEW related products, etc. Wish I could see one of the shows! Regarding all of the comments in England... : it is very difficult to understand, but I think they have certain cultural norms and Paul doesn't seem to tow the line...Thank God!! It's totally mean and I'll never forget how everyone was putting him down over Ocean's Kingdom the day after it was performed in NYC, and to great reviews, mind you! No one could have seen it, as they were in England!! So I posted the question as to had any of the people who were slagging it off ...how they could do that and had they gone to NYC to see it?! That was the last post, no one said a word afterwards. It just seems to be what they do there, it really gets me mad, but it's just some type of cultural thing over there Not everyone in England is like that of course... love my Paul fan, friends over there! 2: It's great to see the reception in Japan, isn't it
-
The other day, NEW had total world sales of about 288,000 after 21 days. Does anyone have more current worldwide sales totals? NEW, relatively speaking, has been a smashing success, It opened at number three in the USA, the biggest market in the world. It opened in Japan at number 2, and the single * New peaked at number four. Japan is nearly twice the size of the UK, how is number two and the single at number four a failure? McCartney is a victim of his own success, he has 25 post Beatles solo studio albums. Plus over half a dozen live albums, half a dozen classical albums, and about four ambient or electronica albums. Not to mention the 13 Beatles studio albums, lets call it a case of over exposure. Cd sales and downloads are near parity in terms of units sold, but sadly for McCartney, most older fans still prefer to buy the physical cd, so he gets beat out of a lot of sales just because "his audience" doesn't buy many downloads. Plus the vinyl will be at least a month late, maybe that's only gonna be ten thousand units, but he could have used those sales the first two weeks. He's released 13 albums in the 21st century, six of them new studio albums. He is 71, and his team or label totally mucked up the timing of his Queenie Eye video, the television appearances *(which preceded) the release of the album. Also to a minority of press and mean spirited people in the UK he is panned unfairly I think. Happily in the USA and in Japan and Latin America at least, he is very very popular and beloved. He entered the biggest music market on the planet *USA at number 3, that's fantastic! But that's only worth 65,000 units sold, in a nation of 320 million people.. horrific, it's a very telling commentary, on changing demographics, and just how badly the excecutives in the USA ran the music business (into the ground)) Don't kid yourself, Paul McCartney is the most succesful recording artist and songwriter in history. If there was no music piracy I wonder how many units he might have sold. It's hard to rally the troops, his marginal or casual fans, when this is his sixth studio and 13th overall album this century, John Lennon only released seven studio albums before he was killed. Because there aren't very many, they are revered like gold. McCartney could do a lot of things to sell more cds, At 71 he needs the Beatles name, too many of his fans have died of old age or stopped buying music, If he fixed up a Beatles outtake similar to Free As A Bird and included it on his album, if he tours to support the album, if he does three or four expensive videos like the Queenie eye video, if he buys more ads on television and magazines to promote the album, does more interviews, he can shepard over NEW until it gradually sells a couple million copies. If he didin't have so many projects people would have paid more attention to this one, this is the 13th time he has promoted an album this century, the casual fan becomes confused. He has about the worst set of advisors, promoters, publicists in history, and he and them confuse the public.
-
Yes, I absolutely agree that he has confused the public, but maybe that's more a by-product of his musical diversity than what his advisers tell him. When I went to get the Beatles' new BBC collection at Best Buy today, I noticed that they have a TON of "New" CDs (regular and Best Buy versions). Perhaps if people go in to buy the Beatles disc, they'll notice the McCartney one (it's hard not to!) and pick that up too if they don't have it already. Meanwhile, I'm seeing references to the 50th anniversary of US Beatlemania all over the place, and something tells me that will overshadow Paul's solo promotion efforts from now till February. It's already confirmed that there will be a big Beatles tribute on the Grammys at the end of January (not known if Paul and/or Ringo will be there). I think that after February, if/when Paul announces tour dates for 2014, that could spark a revival of interest in "New."
-
whobeatle:
The other day, NEW had total world sales of about 288,000 after 21 days. Does anyone have more current worldwide sales totals? NEW, relatively speaking, has been a smashing success, It opened at number three in the USA, the biggest market in the world. It opened in Japan at number 2, and the single * New peaked at number four. Japan is nearly twice the size of the UK, how is number two and the single at number four a failure? McCartney is a victim of his own success, he has 25 post Beatles solo studio albums. Plus over half a dozen live albums, half a dozen classical albums, and about four ambient or electronica albums. Not to mention the 13 Beatles studio albums, lets call it a case of over exposure. Cd sales and downloads are near parity in terms of units sold, but sadly for McCartney, most older fans still prefer to buy the physical cd, so he gets beat out of a lot of sales just because "his audience" doesn't buy many downloads. Plus the vinyl will be at least a month late, maybe that's only gonna be ten thousand units, but he could have used those sales the first two weeks. He's released 13 albums in the 21st century, six of them new studio albums. He is 71, and his team or label totally mucked up the timing of his Queenie Eye video, the television appearances *(which preceded) the release of the album. Also to a minority of press and mean spirited people in the UK he is panned unfairly I think. Happily in the USA and in Japan and Latin America at least, he is very very popular and beloved. He entered the biggest music market on the planet *USA at number 3, that's fantastic! But that's only worth 65,000 units sold, in a nation of 320 million people.. horrific, it's a very telling commentary, on changing demographics, and just how badly the excecutives in the USA ran the music business (into the ground)) Don't kid yourself, Paul McCartney is the most succesful recording artist and songwriter in history. If there was no music piracy I wonder how many units he might have sold. It's hard to rally the troops, his marginal or casual fans, when this is his sixth studio and 13th overall album this century, John Lennon only released seven studio albums before he was killed. Because there aren't very many, they are revered like gold. McCartney could do a lot of things to sell more cds, At 71 he needs the Beatles name, too many of his fans have died of old age or stopped buying music, If he fixed up a Beatles outtake similar to Free As A Bird and included it on his album, if he tours to support the album, if he does three or four expensive videos like the Queenie eye video, if he buys more ads on television and magazines to promote the album, does more interviews, he can shepard over NEW until it gradually sells a couple million copies. If he didin't have so many projects people would have paid more attention to this one, this is the 13th time he has promoted an album this century, the casual fan becomes confused. He has about the worst set of advisors, promoters, publicists in history, and he and them confuse the public.
I have been looking for a message like yours, you summed it up quite well. I can well remember how his sales started to sag in the early 80s and how I kept hoping for something huge in terms of sales after Tug of War and it just wouldn't happen during that decade. Then Broad Street and the bad press on that carried over and unfairly hurt Press to Play, plus industry changes, etc. brought us to the point we are at today. Somewhere along the way, I think in the 90s, I pretty much quit worrying about it and just enjoy his music regardless and try not to follow the charts to where I am upset. Fact is, all his older fans, people like me in the their 50s on up don't buy much of ANY music these days and most prefer to have Paul placed carefully in a nice time capsule marked "BEATLES" and can't move beyond that, which is THEIR fault. A song like New is fantastic and one would think they would readily embrace it in terms of sales but it just doesn't have that magic word Beatles on it, even though it certainly has that magic sound. Someone on here said that New has only sold 15,000 copies in the UK. If correct, that's less people than he will play to in Japan in just one night! That's where the stage is the place he devotes some much time to these days, that and his own nostalgia for his early days. Those shows there will help sales, just as I am sure a 2014 tour in the US, UK, etc. will help sales as well. That's what happened with Flowers in the Dirt in 1989, that album came out in June that year, he hit the road in the fall and then made it here in December with sales moving up after they sagged following the summer release. Lot harder to sell them now than the 70s but give him time, he can do it!
-
Apollo C. Vermouth:
With poor performance of New in UK charts (75) so far compared to US , although US could be better (17 on Billboard). I wonder why Paul's UK fan base or just the general public have lost interest. I often wonder is it the " tall poppy" syndrome. I am sure any objective listener would agree New is a excellent album as most critics have said. So it must be something else working against it. What do you Brits think ???
Lack of radio airplay for the singles, I think. So what you have, as a result, is the core McCartney fans buying on the week of release showing a strong first week chart position. And after that, the album then drops away quickly. Same scenario with Metal bands to. I would like to see the album still in the top 20 at least, but never mind as the album itself is very strong and that's most important in my books.
-
Look 288,000 copies in 21 days is very good in todays world. I think McCartney's people made a grave error in promotion, by focusing on youtube and download sales. McCartney has some young fans of course. But the majority of his fans are older, they prefer cd and traditional advertising on television and radio and print magazines. Of course you're profit may go down as you are increasing costs when you buy print and tv ads, but it gets the word out to the older Beatles or Wings fan. Gotta spend on advertising to get the word out. McCartney having a nice new album out, isin't the automatic number one it would have been years ago. Fans have died off, fans have stopped buying music. In today's rough economy someone with seven Paul McCartney cds on the music shelf, may not be that inspired to buy that eighth album, unless you really bombard them with heavy touring, television appearances and advertising. Radio is not nearly as important as it once was, but it would help, sadly he doesn't get much airplay. New is a terrific album, the world goes on, the sun will come up tomorrow, McCartney will still be worth a billion, the most succesful songwriter in history. Eventually this album will break a million units sold, and that's very good in 2013, remarkable for a guy 71. If Paul and Ringo are seen in public a couple times, and rumors swirl about a new unreleased Beatles song from the archives, New will slam right back into the top ten. Believe me there are ways to make things happen. Question is, will McCartney let the sharks out to make a strong run when he hits Europe or the States with some concerts. Watch Japan buy an extra 20-30 thousand copies of New just because he is playing a few shows there.